Russian Haxorz? There's "...no evidence that Russia is involved. None at all."

Razer g2s at riseup.net
Fri Jan 6 20:04:50 PST 2017


Moon of Alabama:

> January 06, 2017
>
> New Intelligence Report Adds No Evidence Of "Russian Hacking" (Updated)
>
> UPDATE: Up to today there is no public evidence that Russia hacked the
> Democratic National Council and/or released DNC material to Wikileaks.
> After today's new intelligence report (pdf) there is still no such
> evidence. (One third of the report is dedicated to criticize the
> Russian government's TV outlet Russia Today for criticizing Hillary
> Clinton. The RT viewer numbers claimed in the report are evidently
> false from 2012 and thereby completely irrelevant.) There are rather
> wild assertions and a lot of conjecture but zero facts that could be
> accepted as proof.
>
> End-update
>
> When Hillary Clinton was defeated in the U.S. presidential election
> the relevant powers launched a campaign to delegitimize the President
> elect Donald Trump.
>
> The ultimate aim of the cabal is to kick him out of office and have a
> reliable replacement, like the Vice-President elect Pence, take over.
> Should that not be possible it is hoped that the delegitimization will
> make it impossible for Trump to change major policy trajectories
> especially in foreign policy. A main issue here is the reorientation
> of the U.S. military complex and its NATO proxies from the war of
> terror towards a direct confrontation with main powers like Russia and
> China.
>
> The cabal consists of President Obama, the defeated candidate Hillary
> Clinton, neoconservatves like the State Department's cookie dispenser
> Victoria Nuland, the Republican senators McCain and Lindsay and the
> military-industrial complex. (One of the few neocons planted near to
> Trump, former CIA director James Woolsey, threw the towel today and
> left the Trump transition team.)
>
> A major role in directing the plot has fallen to Obama's consigliere
> John Brennan, the current director of the CIA. Another role has been
> delegated to the various military and NATO think tanks like the
> Atlantic Council and the British RUSI and reliable proxies within the
> media.
>
> The current emphasis of the campaign is on the release of emails and
> papers from the Clinton campaign through Wikileaks. It is alleged that
> some releases were gained through hacking, planned and executed by the
> Russian government. Trump had announced that he plans to seek good
> relations with Russia, the power that the cabal had earlier chosen as
> the new enemy de jour.
>
> But there is a problem. There is no real evidence that a "hack" ever
> happened. There is no evidence that Russia is involved. None at all.
>

Analysis follows with lottsa links all over the page to pertinent dox...
It IS interesting to note that one of the links leads to a little tidbit
about how wrong Crowdstrike, the 'cyber-something' the FBI and DNC both
apparently had a 'go-to' relationship with about the Russian non-hacks
was totally wrong with another analysis they had done regarding a
Russian hack on... wait for it... Ukraine iOT artillery.

..and the fact that Crowdstrike's founder/cto is Atlantic Council Senior
Fellow Dmitri Alperovitch. The Atlantic Council is a NATO lobby repping
Gulf governments, and defense industry companies

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/01/new-intelligence-report-adds-no-evidence-of-russian-hacking.html

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 4181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170106/a8ad720e/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list