What kind of security matters
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Thu Feb 16 17:37:01 PST 2017
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:47:15AM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> It is unlikely that Trump would manage his own public keys - and he cannot
> trust the white house staff and government security people to manage them
> for him. It is even more unlikely that Podesta would manage his own public
> keys. So we need a security mechanism for the masses, a security mechanism
> that even the Chairman of the Board can use, a security mechanism suitable
> for everyone in the world, a security mechanism that requires zero clicks.
Ack.
IPSEC was in principle the right approach in so far as "pre-emptive" or
opportunistic "link" encryption (i.e., your communication channel, by
default - as you say, zero clicks).
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list