change.org "declare antifa illegal/terrorist" petition

[Razer]

On 02/10/2017 10:28 AM, Joshua Case wrote:

> meaning, you won’t interact with me unless it’s in front of other people? 

Yup. That's Eggs-ackly what I mean.

> because you need that level of attention? 


No. Because you need the pubic 'exposure'.

> I was just trying to reduce the level of idiocy before i just plain
> muted you, like everyone else on this list has, and are imploring me
> to do.

Odd. More intelligent people seem to respond to my posting, when they
feel it, than I've seen responding to yours. But posting items to a list
isn't a popularity contest ... now is it? It's really an insight of your
interests, to others on the list...(and fwiw I don't consider the
fascist trolls like Z, J, 'The Donald', and tentatively the wordy but
still socially ignorant JB, really intelligent. Unless you consider
reptilian aliens 'intelligent' in any way but socially vicious
intelligence.)

>
> i’m not insecure with respect to my intellect, or schmuckiness - i’m
> alarmed that you’d use such a patriarchal type of genitals insult. i’m
> smart enough to see through people like you, and i am not a penis. 
>

Ah! You know some Yiddish! Ok then. Putz. Colloquially, 'Wasted sperm on
the ground'.

Just like you're wasting my time responding to you. For the last time.

Rr


>
>> On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Razer <g2s at riseup.net
>> <mailto:g2s at riseup.net>> wrote:
>>
>> That's right. I'm insulting your intellect.
>>
>> Don't contact me offlist again schmuck. I'm too busy for you nonsesne
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2017 10:07 AM, Joshua Case wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> So are the people who run world governments that commit Genocide
>>>> and the officers of corporations poisoning the planet (and our
>>>> minds, with advertising of the products causing the physical
>>>> poisoning).
>>>>
>>>> You aren't making your case spewball.
>>>>
>>>> "Rational" is relative.
>>>>
>>>> Rr
>>>>
>>>>> I don’t agree with Jim on all points, hardly any maybe, but i’fe
>>>>> heard his stuff, listened to him talk. he’s rational, it seems. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That’s all you’ve got? An obvious and blatant strawman fallacy and
>>> some intellect insult? And no, rational is not relative - it’s not
>>> everywhere, but it’s not relative. It has a precise definition, and
>>> there is a mathematical proof for it.
>>>
>>> You might spend more time reading, less time writing for a while. 
>>>
>>> Unless you’re just a paid troll to keep this list off topic,
>>> undermining productive countercultural projects and coordination. In
>>> which case, great work. Keep hitting send! 
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 9229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170210/b3634f7c/attachment.txt>