97% of Scientists

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Sun Feb 5 05:56:15 PST 2017


On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 11:20:13PM -0000, Core Samples wrote:
> The case of 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human beings are the
> main cause of warming.
> 
> 
> 
> One of the main papers behind the 97 percent claim is authored by John Cook:
> 
> Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the
> Scientific Literature
> http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/pdf

And more - the lies keep coming (getting exposed thankfully):
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

"
The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in
the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never
existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than
scientists expected.
...
But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an
impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence
that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process –
which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were
overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant
attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster
paper.
"


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list