USA: National Security Strategy, Juan's Wet Dream -- OFF-TOPIC (James Donald is a creep)

[John Newman]

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 03:51:11PM -0300, juan wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:27:46 +1000
> "James A. Donald" <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 12/27/2017 6:35 AM, juan wrote:
> > > 	again, your mental vomits have been addressed multiple
> > > times.
> > 
> > You just repeat your lies over and over without explanation or
> > argument.
> > 
> > Repetitious assertion is unconvincing.

<snip>

Holy shit, this is still going on. This is one of the reasons I
blocked James "Jim" Donald so long ago. The other is that he is complete
human garbage.

So, warning, this post is completely off-topic, I'm not trying to
debate the existence of Christ, to my mind the case is closed, and
whosoever wants to believe some silly shit can believe as they will.
This post is just about James Donald. He would be a menace if he
weren't a total fucking crank; his ideology is still horrifying.
So, feel free to stop reading here if you don't care about James
Donald, or if you have a weak stomach. As I said before, all you
need to know about Jim is is all over his blog, https://blog.jim.com.

His latest entry, my apologies to anyone whom this makes ill, is a
perfect example. I'm going to paste it below and after that I'm done
with James Donald, directly or indirectly. This blog post is so fucking
deranged, in such a mean, fucked up, way.. well, it can only speak for
itself:



All women are like that
December 27th, 2017
Women are attracted to arrogant violent men. They are attracted to IQ<80
criminals because criminals are allowed to be violent, while high status
males are not, with the result that the status hierarchy as perceived by
women winds up upside down from the status hierarchy as perceived by
men. AWALT. All women are like that. When people say that not all women
are like that, NAWALT, it is like aging fat feminists saying that
different men have different types so you can't say one type of beauty
overrules the others. Not so: Men want to fuck young, beautiful and
fertile women. Women want to fuck arrogant, violent, criminal men. That
is all there is to it. We may nuance after accepting that, but only
after accepting that. Brad Pitt got horribly burned. Einstein wound up
with a KGB girl friend who cared more about Stalin than Einstein.
Feynman needed to learn game, put on an asshole persona, did pretty much
what I am doing. If not all women were like that, these famous men would
have done better. Feynman scored, I scored, but if General Butt Naked
had shown up, wearing a necklace of human eyeballs, an AK47, and nothing
else, we would have been shit out of luck. All women react to the same
stimuli in the same way. It is just a matter of which stimuli they get
exposed to. If Feynman cannot score merely being brilliant, famous, and
admired, Brad Pitt gets burned despite being rich, famous, and handsome,
Einstein winds up having sex with the KGB and serving as a communist
loudspeaker, then all women are like that. The lioness knows which lion
to fuck, because she sees him killing her kittens. To align the crude,
cruel, simplistic, vicious, and brutal female perception of the male
status hierarchy with the subtle, complex, multidimensional, and nuanced
reality of the male status hierarchy as actually organized by males, we
need to legalize and socially support domestic discipline by taxpaying
husbands and fathers, also husbands and fathers that are members of the
military, the police, rentacops, and mercenaries. (McLintock), and back
that discipline with conspicuously public state violence. We also need
to make it legal to use violence on men who come sniffing round your
women, as the law was under King Solomon. Then hypergamy will be
eugenic, rather than dysgenic. Right now, hypergamy is massively
dysgenic. Hence the character I play when interacting with fertile age
women.

Women have a primitive concept of power. And we men are all dancing
monkeys. So, the thing we are forced to do is to become powerful as
women understand power.

Which unfortunately is anti civilizational and counter civilizational.
Hence the need to modify civilization so that high status males get to
perform more private violence. It is easier to have more private
policing, to make male status hierarchies more convincing to women, than
it is to make women have sex with the men that they should, and refrain
from having sex with the men that they should not.

When affluent respectable middle class white males beat misbehaving
daughters and wives, and receive any necessary public assistance in so
doing from police and authorities, while low lives do not receive
similar assistance, then IQ<80 criminals will stop being so strangely
attractive to women, and the guy in the corner office will find himself
receiving hot letters from women he has never met. But that said, women
are quite agreeable to being made to have sex. They prefer it that way.
Resistance is a shit test, and they are turned on by being overpowered.
So we need to make it the law that the man that they should have sex
with, their husband, the father of their children, gets to overpower
them.

Posted in culture | 3 Comments
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20171227/fbbec2a1/attachment.sig>