opennic is safe ?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:27:25PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40:05AM +0800, James A. Donald wrote:
> > On 2017-08-29 07:31, juan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800
> > > "James A. Donald" <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by
> > > > enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn,
> > > > they would not block drug dealing,  but block nazis,
> > > 
> > > 	how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called
> > > 	'hidden' services?
> > 
> > After Stormfront was shut down, it was recreated on a tor hidden service, which was then throttled down to
> > unusuability.
> 
> It is possible that Weev does not actually know that it takes at
> least a few days, and really a few weeks, to build up a Tor-network
> profile whereby other nodes and willing to accept significant traffic
> from the new node - this is my understanding of how Tor relays work.
> 
> It is of course also possible that there is an intended and targetted
> clampdown on TDS.
> 
> But the first step is to grok how Tor works, and eliminate such a
> possibility.
> 
> Ultimately, Tor has a crippled TCP underlying protocol/comms layer -
> a new UDP (or even lower) protocol layer is ultimately needed so that
> a free speech network becomes a proper switched network.  But that's
> another of those things that Tor "strangely" keeps failing to get
> funding for...

s/Weev/the admin for stormfront/