Daily Stormer Hit From All Sides

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:28:14PM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 03:57 PM, Mike Duvos wrote:
> > It will be interesting to see what happens with the site, because
> > right now, they are kind of the Spotted Owl in the free speech forest.
> 
> Honestly, I think we're overdue for SCOTUS to make some new rulings on
> the First Amendment, though I am not sure I want the current SCOTUS to
> be the one making those rulings. (We all know Merrick Garland should be
> on the bench in place of Gorsuch, or at least should have gotten a
> proper "nay" vote.)
> 
> How much of what is or was on The Daily Stormer could be qualified in
> some form as "fighting words" (i.e. in the words of Justice Frank Murphy
> "those [words] which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to
> incite an immediate breach of the peace")? How much of what has been
> posted to this list could potentially qualify?
> 
> I'm not Jewish and nowhere near black, yet I find what happened in
> Charlottesville horrifying. This is 2017, not 1957 or 1877.
> 
> -- 
> Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
> http://www.rantroulette.com
> http://www.skqrecordquest.com

Astounding anarchist position from Shawn Quin, AS USUAL.

You're up there with Chomsky's "pro" science stand :D