Daily Stormer Hit From All Sides

[Razer]

On 08/16/2017 05:32 PM, Umair Chachar wrote:
> Joshua, I think you might've missed what Mike was trying to say. With
> mega corporate overlords taking over control of the internet, they can
> deny any unpopular speech from being put on the internet just by
> declaring that it's "hate speech."
>
> Literally what I just said could be counted as "hate speech" because
> it's such a subjective term. It's a threat to freedom of speech.
>
> Sincerely,
> Umair Chachar
>

It's NOT specifically about speech. By definition anyone who would deny,
or ESPOUSES the denial of someone's right to exist based on some
unalterable feature of their existence like skin color of religion of
birth forfeits not only forfeits their right to 'free speech', they
forfeit the right to exist themselves, because to allow it implies you'd
allow your own self-extermination. In other words you have to
proactively act in  self-defense.

OFC then they claim to be the victims.

Meanwhile the Stormer article that got them bounced from GoDaddy said
(paraphrase) the woman who got run down (a tactic learned from 'islamic
terrorists' btw) was a fat 30-something year old woman who hadn't bred
and therefore she was worthless. What I said above about "ESPOUSES the
denial of someone's right to exist based on..." is operational here.


Also note during the Bundy Bozos Oregon standoff there were adolescents
and teen speaking to a city meeting about the refuge occupation
literally in tears claiming they were in abject fear of the Bundy crew.

In other words. Terrorism. What do we do with terrorists? ESPECIALLY
ones who terrorize CHILDREN?

Death is too good for them. I can't wait to 'victimize' a few affluent
white men who can afford 'tactical bacon' and replica military weapons
(but forgot their clean socks and tidy [snigger] whities) I knew guys
like that at the disc drive company I worked for. They moved from
affluent white suburbs to places in semi-rural areas outside cities and
were frightened of everything, imaginary marauders who were going to
home-invade their semi-rural paradise, and the Mexican restaurant
workers next door ('gangbangers' natch) too, and bought guns, and were
the most likely people to crack and show up at work to slaughter their
co-workers.

Rr




>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: RE: Daily Stormer Hit From All Sides
>> Local Time: August 16, 2017 5:09 PM
>> UTC Time: August 16, 2017 9:09 PM
>> From: joshua2014 at protonmail.ch
>> To: cp <cypherpunks at cpunks.org>
>>
>> I'm so glad to hear it!
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mike Duvos<mpd at wolf359.net <mailto:mpd at wolf359.net%20class=>>
>> Date: On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:57 PM
>> Subject: Fwd: Daily Stormer Hit From All Sides
>> To: <cypherpunks at cpunks.org <mailto:cypherpunks at cpunks.org%20>>
>> CC:
>>
>>     Everyone's favorite Neo-Nazi parody and trolling site, The Daily
>>     Stormer, written by Andrew Anglin, has had a bad several days.
>>     They published an article calling the road rage victim at the
>>     "Unite the Right " rally a "fat childless 32-year-old slut, " and
>>     the forces of political correctness went wild. GoDaddy gave them
>>     24 hours to find a new domain registrar, and they moved to
>>     Google. Google cancelled their registration and froze the domain,
>>     preventing them from moving it again, effectively stealing it.
>>     They came back up as dailystormer.wang, in Chinese jurisdiction,
>>     but that domain was seized after a few hours. They then tried
>>     dailystormer.ru, but Cloudflare then dumped them after a Quartz
>>     article accused Cloudflare of "Enabling Hate. " Twitter then
>>     cancelled their status page. They've managed to get an onion
>>     address up, at dstormer6em3i4km.onion which points to the few
>>     places they haven't been kicked off of yet. With major chunks of
>>     important Internet infrastructure in the hands of giant private
>>     corporations, who can decline service to anyone at any time for
>>     any reason, unpopular speech can get stomped on without it
>>     technically being "censorship ", which is regulation of speech by
>>     the government. Reading The Daily Stormer doesn't make anyone a
>>     Nazi, anymore than reading The Landover Baptist Church makes
>>     someone a Baptist. It will be interesting to see what happens
>>     with the site, because right now, they are kind of the Spotted
>>     Owl in the free speech forest. -- Mike Duvos mpd at wolf359.net
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 8878 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170816/10a126a9/attachment.txt>