part 3 -- Propaganda 1-0-1 - [pfkr at pfkr.org: [ PFKR ] Female employee on the Google memo: 'I don't know how we could feel anything but attacked by that']

Sun Aug 13 21:33:53 PDT 2017

Classic Lefty propaganda parades itself for our analytical pleasure
:)

Liberal Lefty propaganda hit squad mug shots, exposing themselves in
all their factless feely fuhrenlugenlumpenessenen inglory:

 - "the infamous memo" is only ever alluded to, never quoted
   quoting the source would of course despose the lie exposed in
   reposing factual prose

 - clever rhetoric effectively disguising the lack of any
   critical/constructive analysis of the memo itself whatsoever, and
   thereby short ciruiting all rational, critical debate e.g.:
   "You've read the memo, right?"

 - feelings are the only significant things, and all feelings are
   facts, and the world must revolve around feelings, e.g.:
   "Yesterday the women in the Ads group got together ...
    listening session ...
    and it's hard to not feel like that's an attack on you
    personally"

   and more tear jerkingly beautiful morono propo ganda:
   "Steve Kovach: Why did you want to talk to me?
    Lauren: Mainly because I felt like no one was asking the women of
    Google how they felt"

   And the joy turns ecstatic as we realise that, instead of actually
   responding to any (as in ANY) of the claims made by Damore in his
   10-page memo (plenty of quotable material in that 10 pages too),
   this Lauren woman then goes on to -complain- that:
   "What about all the women? ... no one is asking us to respond to
    the claims that he made about us"

 - classic faux empathy/ pretend group-alignment e.g.:
   “Look, I’m a conservative. I completely disagree with everything
    he said, but I’m still a conservative.

   which is beautifully preceeded with this psychobabble pre-seeding
   nugget:
   "Can Google do a better job at making conservatives in the company
    feel like they can voice their views? (Yes.)"

   Very impressive, BussinessInsider.comm, very impressive!

 - implying facts from the --completely unquoted-- source, whilst
   twisting what was said into a 180° opposite meaning (by
   implication), e.g.:
   "But to have us all lumped into one sort of category like that"

 - At least one of the big-bold header bylines expresses some
   honesty, if you can read it right:
   "A female Google employee named Lauren tells Business Insider that
   most of the attention surrounding James Damore’s memo has nothing
   to do with how women inside the company feel."

   which actually means "A female Google employee named Lauren tells
   Business Insider that most of the attention surrounding James
   Damore’s memo has nothing to do with how women inside the company
   feel ... and dang it, we should all focus on how us women feel
   already - how dare everybody focus on the content of the memo and
   what its author actually wrote! We have FEELINGS and we WILL be
   head for many many hours about our feelings because its all just
   not OK!"

 - more big bold header byline goodness:
  "Lauren says she feels like she’s had great opportunities within
   Google, and has received support from leaders life CEO Sundar
   Pichai and CFO Ruth Porat."

   Yes, yes I'm sure you don't want to lose Mr Sookysooky as you
   "cry-in-Tuesdays CEO of the century", so suck up good and proper,
   give Google a feel-good and hopefully the feel-good will continue;
   don't want to losse a Sookysook CEO now.

 - some beautiful fact-free reader impact targetting:
   "But the impact on the group targeted in the memo has been largely
    ignored."

   This is seriously some fine psychological propaganda - if "why
   it's propaganda" does not quite add up for you, just go read James
   "Damore CoC, da worse it gets" Damore's original, actual memo,
   then re-read this article to see how (really) quite sophisticated
   this Bu$$ine$$In$ider.comm article really is...

 - evident butt covering and "just in case you were at all concerned"
   this really IS propaganda disclaimer:
   "had approval from Google to speak to the press"

   This one's actually a double-whammy for the cotton-wool children
   of Gen-XYZ, since it subtly reinforces the --- externalisation of
   authority --- "oh it's all ok here, talking about our feelings,
   ignoring the facts, and even utterly misrepresenting the original
   source - it's all ok see, because this talking lady HAS AUTHORITY
   FROM GOOGLE to talk publicly".

   Just as well she GOT AUTHORITY FROM GOOGLE BEFORE SHE TALKED
   PUBLICLY!  Shit, she might have caused a real PR disaster
   otherwise :)

 - classic fear indoctrination:
  "but I’m only using her first name because many of her colleagues
   have been outed on fringe websites, raising safety concerns"

 - more fear, but more importantly, some post-facto justification for
   Sookysooky's "internal Google `Town Hall`" cancellation:
   "In fact, it was the safety issue that caused CEO Sundar Pichai to
    cancel a town hall meeting Thursday that was supposed to answer
    questions about Damore’s memo"

 - and the embarrassing truth of Google's first cry-in on this issue
   is thankfully exposed in full plainality:
   "Kovach: What came out of that session?
   Lauren: There was no agenda."

Hmm ... perfectly clear I must say, perfectly clear there Lauren :)

And so it goes and on it goes ... worth reading in its entirety as a
reminder of classic Lefty group think - I'm barely 1/4 the way
through, but I think the gist of this cry-in is entirely evident -
Juan would surely be proud of 'em :D

:)
Z

PS: Evidently, Pichai Sookysookysundarajanandanan has lifted his game
... not.  Perhaps this an appropriate nick for him - Sookysookanan,
the world's most overly paid sooky sook pretending to be a CEO.
Oh well, evidently Google can afford such indulgences...

----- Forwarded message from "PFKR (People For Kangz Responsibility) Announcement List" <pfkr at pfkr.org> -----
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:50:29 -0700

Female employee on the Google memo: 'I don't know how we could feel anything but attacked by that'

http://www.businessinsider.com/female-google-employee-responds-to-james-damore-memo-2017-8

	"You've read the memo, right? I'm not a female engineer, but
	 I've talked to a lot of female engineers.  Yesterday the women
	 in the Ads group got together with one of the directors of
	 engineering. She organized a sort of listening session and we
	 kind of all just sat down and talked about it. I think it's
	 just really hard to have someone make baseless claims about
	 your abilities in the workplace, and I think that's what
	 happened. And it's hard to not feel like that's an attack on
	 you personally, and on us collectively. We talk a lot about
	 how women at Google are a minority. We're not a minority
	 [outside of Google], but we kind of are [inside].  But to have
	 us all lumped into one sort of category like that and to have
	 such a baseless claim made about who we are, and to have it
	 positioned as fact -- as scientific fact -- I don't know how
	 we could feel anything but attacked by that."

 - - -

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein (lauren at kangz.com): https://www.kangz.com/lauren
Co-Founder: People For Kangz Responsibility: https://www.kangz.org/pfkr-info
--- Impeach Trump cuz """"DUMOCRACY"""" ---
_______________________________________________
pfkr mailing list
https://lists.kangz.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir

----- End forwarded message -----