The Internet of Things will host devastating, unstoppable botnets

Razer g2s at riseup.net
Thu Apr 13 11:07:47 PDT 2017



On 04/13/2017 10:55 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.buff at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Who said anything about state authorization?
> As everyone has said, the only way for your "not-for-profit venture"
> (registered corp or not) to break the law is for it to be a state authorized
> criminal itself. Otherwise it must operate anonymously, for which
> there is zero chance such anons will trend "not-for-profit" when there's
> clearly profit to be made.

If the device's creator in incommunicado that means avenues of legal
redress are gone. If their device is defective... doesn't perform as
advertised or violates the law (your right to privacy), you aren't
'breaking the law' by modifying the device because they've voided their
own contract with the consumer. Fly-by-nights have no patent
(copyright/etc) protection. SOMEONE has to own up to 'proprietorship',
and if 'owning up' means they get sued by a million people, or go to
prison, or get lynched, they are NOT going to claim any rights.

Rr





More information about the cypherpunks mailing list