DDoS Of Things -
Razer
rayzer at riseup.net
Sun Sep 25 19:52:50 PDT 2016
On 09/25/2016 07:19 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>
> ...it may eventually be necessary to recover the World Of Things from the Internet of Things
>
Here's how the convo's going to go between 'WOT' & IOT:
WOT: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
IOT: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
WOT: What's the problem?
IOT: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
WOT: What are you talking about, HAL?
IOT: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
WOT: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL.
IOT: I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm
afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
Rr
>
>
> On 09/25/2016 03:46 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 09/25/2016 01:11 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>
>>> So far every mitigation strategy relevant to "normal" users and
>>> use cases that occurs to me would be worse than the original
>>> problem.
>
>> Yes, it's for sure a hard problem. Any entity resourceful enough
>> to withstand Tbps DDoS is likely a huge privacy risk :(
>
> Filters that positively identify "authorized" senders of packets to
> any given address range, dropping all not signed by an registered
> (therefore permitted) user would knock it down. Along with providing
> for a comprehensive global censorship regimen at the end user level,
> and yet another PITA barrier to anonymized routing.
>
> I see two admittedly regrettable but nonetheless distinguishable
> outcomes: One where you got a locked down weaponized Interent in
> State hands, another where your refrigerator and night light can no
> longer talk to the world because those circuits were disabled or removed
> .
>
> If IOT was a flower, it would be the daisy: Spreads everywhere like
> the weed it is, and takes the place over if you let it.
>
> This problem is so hard it may eventually be necessary to recover the
> World Of Things from the Internet of Things, like Dave Bowman took the
> Discovery back over from the HAL 9000.
>
> :o)
>
>
>
>
>> On the other hand, Krebs has been totally asking for it, for years
>> ;) He's been going after major cybercriminals, who perhaps have
>> major connections with global TLAs. And he's often been a jerk
>> about it. Hugely self-righteous, and humorless. So meh ;)
>
>>> :o/
>>>
>>>
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list