Philosophokiddies

Stephen D. Williams sdw at lig.net
Thu Sep 8 00:06:20 PDT 2016


On 9/7/16 5:59 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
> *From:* Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net>
> On 9/6/16 9:01 PM, jim bell wrote:
> ...
> >I didn't comment about it.  The Purge movies always remind me of AP.  Not the same, but related.
> http://www.thepurgemovie.co.uk/
>
> >My preference is to consider ideas that are likely to improve things.  AP doesn't seem promising, although good to keep in mind.
>
> That's a rather weak answer.  Why is AP unlikely to improve things?  Some people have said it will work "too well".  Be specific.
>  What do you say are its faults?  Will it get rid of governments?  Will it defend libertarian or anarchic regions?

A system where anyone can be targeted for any reason will cause fear, certainty seeking, last resort alliance building, fatalist
resignation and cynicism in the general population, and similar to spiral out of control.  Groups will develop feudal protection
rackets, clans, private protection details, and events, mistakes or not, will trigger a cascade of blood feuds.

I haven't analyzed it thoroughly, at a glance it seems that kind of negative dynamic, regardless of actual risk, will sour the whole
society.

>            Jim Bell
>
>>
>> >>Also, take a look at this:
>>  https://steemit.com/assassinationpolitics/@dollarvigilante/world-exclusive-first-interview-with-jim-bell-of-assassination-politics-since-released-from-jail  
>>

sdw

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 17311 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160908/ba293a4f/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list