Suggestion to list admins for warning/disclaimer on the web for new subscribers
Greg Newby
gbnewby at pglaf.org
Sun Sep 4 17:20:38 PDT 2016
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 10:55:24AM -0700, Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2016 10:37 AM, oshwm wrote:
> > Should the list really be forwarding new people to pastebin considering
> > it sits behind Cloudflare?
>
>
> Pastebin is using Cloudflare?
>
> Sigh... add another to the shit list.
Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't realize it either.
It's a pretty good little page, though, and I didn't know about it until it was mentioned here last week. The page: http://pastebin.com/irj4Fyd5
It turns out that the content is available on a few other sites, including Cryptome. So, I linked to it there, instead: https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
For those who enjoy a good read on some of these topics, you might enjoy the WWII-era "Simple Sabotage Field Manual."
CIA released it in 2008: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2012-featured-story-archive/CleanedUOSSSimpleSabotage_sm.pdf
Project Gutenberg did proofreading etc.: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184
In fiction, many of those techniques were rediscovered (e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monkey_Wrench_Gang). Likewise in real life (e.g., Weyler's Greenpeace, https://books.google.ca/books?id=M1GW445y2n4C&redir_esc=y and http://earthmanifesto.com/).
In forums like Cypherpunks, we enjoy some of the Simple Sabotage techniques daily. I especially appreciate the demands to provide full evidence and citations to any claims. Also the indigenent objections that COINTELPRO techniques are ancient history, and no such thing happens any more.
- Greg
> > Or maybe the list really isn't what it used to be?
> >
> > oshwm.
> >
> > On 04/09/16 18:33, Greg Newby wrote:
> >> Dear Zenaan, Georgi:
> >>
> >> Good suggestions, thanks! I edited the list public HTML based on what's below, and also the nice Pastebin article that was posted here recently.
> >>
> >> https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo
> >>
> >> - Greg
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 09:31:12PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:23:48PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> >>>> The wikipedia page on cypherpunks have nothing to do with the current
> >>>> state of this list. History gets rewritten (from experience).
> >>>>
> >>>> I suggest after list discussion the list admins to put a warning on the
> >>>> list web page. Something along the lines of (clearly needs rewriting):
> >>>>
> >>>> ====
> >>>> The list is not it used to be and has nothing to do with the wikipedia
> >>>> page.
> >>>>
> >>>> The list has spooks, paid trolls, other similar whores and possibly
> >>>> crackpots.
> >>>>
> >>>> Some of them post actively, others rarely.
> >>>>
> >>>> Their motivation might include:
> >>>> * social engineering
> >>>> * manipulating opinions
> >>>> * profiting from the past reputation of the term cypherpunk
> >>>> * killing the list
> >>>>
> >>>> "What You See is NOT What You Get"
> >>>>
> >>>> Use common sense when reading or posting to the list.
> >>>> ====
> >>>
> >>> Excellent suggestion - full disclosure and pre-forewarning is highly
> >>> recommended. We have a duty of care to newcomers to make sure they don't
> >>> get involved in anything they might want to not get involved in, and
> >>> they ought be suitably forewarned :)
> >
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list