Continual Violation of List Charter

[Razer]

On 09/03/2016 06:08 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:

>  Any real political anarchy has been a failure.

Tell that to the people of Barcelona.

Tell that to the Spanish Anarchist Unions.

You ARE 'talking out the side of your neck'.

In other words. Full of shit. Just like 'the troll' (Juan)

Rr

> On 9/3/16 5:46 PM, juan wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:11:33 -0600
>> Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/03/2016 01:17 PM, Xer0Dynamite wrote:
>>>>> We are "anarchists" and we do what we want.
>>>> Anarchy doesn't scale.  What will you expect with billion+ people
>>>> without societal structure?  Watch World War Z and then Book of Eli
>>>> to find out.
>>> Anarchy is a beautiful dream. But it's unworkable, except in small,
>>> self-selected groups. 
>>
>>
>> 	I'm sure that retarded anti anarchy (and pro state)
>> 	propaganda is 'on topic' in this list eh? 
> 
> Some discussion of "* anarchy" isn't really anarchy, it is just maybe
> anarchy to someone fixated on a fixed definition of their favorite
> system.  Or a signal by someone suggesting such a departure.  Any real
> political anarchy has been a failure.  If you have proof that isn't the
> case, then present it.
> 
>>
>> 	
>> http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html
>>
>> 	"Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,  anonymous networks,
>> 	digital pseudonyms, zero, knowledge, reputations, information
>> 	markets,  black markets, collapse of governments."
>>
>>
>> 	What are the last three words there?
> 
> What is the whole paragraph?  Is it a checklist of goals?  Is it a
> statement that everything is desired for any purpose? Or is it a
> definition of a term?
> 
> The whole "manifesto" is a statement of predictions and likely results. 
> The only call to action is a non-specific 'arise'.
> 
>>
>>
>> 	So remind me who are in continual violation of list charter? 
> 
> Juan more time: you philosophokiddies.
> 
> 
> sdw
>