Continual Violation of List Charter

[Stephen D. Williams]

On 9/3/16 5:46 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:11:33 -0600
> Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> On 09/03/2016 01:17 PM, Xer0Dynamite wrote:
>>>> We are "anarchists" and we do what we want.
>>> Anarchy doesn't scale.  What will you expect with billion+ people
>>> without societal structure?  Watch World War Z and then Book of Eli
>>> to find out.
>> Anarchy is a beautiful dream. But it's unworkable, except in small,
>> self-selected groups. 
>
>
> 	I'm sure that retarded anti anarchy (and pro state)
> 	propaganda is 'on topic' in this list eh? 

Some discussion of "* anarchy" isn't really anarchy, it is just maybe anarchy to someone fixated on a fixed definition of their
favorite system.  Or a signal by someone suggesting such a departure.  Any real political anarchy has been a failure.  If you have
proof that isn't the case, then present it.

>
> 	
> http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html
>
> 	"Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,  anonymous networks,
> 	digital pseudonyms, zero, knowledge, reputations, information
> 	markets,  black markets, collapse of governments."
>
>
> 	What are the last three words there?

What is the whole paragraph?  Is it a checklist of goals?  Is it a statement that everything is desired for any purpose? Or is it a
definition of a term?

The whole "manifesto" is a statement of predictions and likely results.  The only call to action is a non-specific 'arise'.

>
>
> 	So remind me who are in continual violation of list charter? 

Juan more time: you philosophokiddies.


sdw

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2731 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160903/510d3de3/attachment.txt>