FOR once and FOR ALL

[Xer0Dynamite]

Oh, and another thing.  Just so that we're all clear of the utter
stupidity of it all (even though it's mentioned in the links I gave
prior):  the Internet Revolution was co-opted into the same fucking
forces as capitalism in America:  GLAM and COMMERCE.  Did you notice
that the simple O(N^2) value generation of the Net is co-opted into a
mere O(N log N) value by network large site co-opting user attention
into data silos to hook them in there for advertising revenue?  The
Net's value originally (back in the late 90's) was scaling value in
the order of Reed's Law:  super-exponential value generation (O(2^N))
by the addition of creating arbitrary groupings (like this cypherpunks
mailing list) on top of the otherwise N^2 value of a effectively
fully-connected network.

So, graph it out:  an 2^N curve versus a N log N curve and watch as
the values of N go above 100.

THAT is the political battle that THIS list should worry about as it
is/was about the Internet Revolution.

Now please give me a report on what you learned in the four texts I
linked to you.


\0x

On 9/3/16, Xer0Dynamite <dreamingforward at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at
>>> that site.  Either the future is made BY us, or it is destroyed by US.
>>> Which is it?
>>
>> While this may be true, and human / civilization may or may not yet be
>> developed enough to be able to think or transcend any given thing,
>
> Then let me tell you:  you didn't come from apes -- nobody did.  The
> fact that there are "DNA" similarities are because there was a human
> BEFORE mammals existed.  The reason there is continual turmoil in the
> Middle East is because SCIENCE is trying to ERADICATE their TRUTHS.
> The all-seeing-eye is not from the same human stock as those of the
> West.  In fact, there are at least THREE genii of men:  homo, hetero,
> and amphi sapiens.  (Which is probably why they started trying to tack
> on a SECOND sapiens onto homo:  homo sapiens sapiens).  We are NOT
> homo (for those of us who come from mothers).
>
>> just going on about some topic like polical schools of thought, without
>> bringing any outcomes back to test and bear on what your're trying to
>> transcend,
>
> Well, now you have it.
>
>> is offtopic, and isn't going to get you anywhere enlightened anytime
>> soon.
>
> Better?
>
> \0x
>