Free speech - front lines in Australia - [personal at bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 16:21:50 PDT 2016
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sounds like Australia needs the equivalent of America's First
> Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and press.But then again,
> that's the same problem Britain has: They don't have a written
> Constitution.
"... But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or
another, this much is certain — that it has either authorized
such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to
prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. " Spooner -
1867
http://jim.com/treason.htm
J.
> Jim Bell
>
> From: Nadine Earnshaw <nadine at iinet.net.au>
> To: cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia -
> [personal at bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]
>
> No the issue is public vs private speech.
> There is also a difference between publicly stating an opinion and
> being abusive. this is what we are talking about legislatively
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list