Scientific Progress
Tom
tom at vondein.org
Thu Oct 27 04:58:06 PDT 2016
Juan,
> Who are they, Tom?
As I understand your mails, you're one of them. Maybe I misunderstood
your mails - my appologies in that case.
> And where's the 'scientific' evidence for your propaganda claim?
Why should I make propaganda? I'm not the government nor do I work for
one. I just happen to love science. Here are a couple of examples of
the kind of science I wrote about earlier:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161026142145.htm
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/10/26/three_stars_illuminate_ngc_6188.html
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap161026.html
How could a sane person think they are 'parasites'? This is nonsense.
> Because you know even two minutes research should inform you of
> what's going on. Unless you are a willfully ignorant, fully
> biased cheerleader for the 'scientific' establishment.
Let me fill in the role you're projecting onto me for a moment: please
show me the evidence of your propaganda claim.
> Oh but you can generalize the other, patently false, way.
I don't. I just say not all science is evil. We'd not have this
discussion otherwise.
> Dude, the 'international' 'scientific' 'community' uses FUCKING
> IMPERIAL ENGLISH, and the universtity parasities in mongolia
> working for mongolia's national universities are no different
> from the parasites at harvard university or berlin university.
> or any other place.
I'd love it to see you on the panel during a science convention or the
like and speak like this to scientists :)
Really, Juan, I surely agree with you, that there are scientists one
could call 'parasites'. But not all of them, that's ridiculous.
Tom.
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list