US DC: We Fucking Own Your Ass

[Razer]

Northern Virginia is where the CIA houses it's high-level
goatfuckers-in-waiting (islamists) and other mercenary scumbuckets like
the ex-Libyan general they tagged to run a contra-army against the
UN-backed government. Just making sure they stay on the CIA's side.

Rr

On 10/25/2016 11:51 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/10/24/2040252/electronic-surveillance-up-500-in-dc-area-since-2011-almost-all-sealed-cases
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/us-courts-electronic-surveillance-up-500-percent-in-dc-area-since-2011-almost-all-sealed-cases/2016/10/22/48693ffa-8f10-11e6-9c52-0b10449e33c4_story.html
> 
> Washington Post: Secret law enforcement requests to conduct electronic
> surveillance in domestic criminal cases have surged in federal courts
> for Northern Virginia and the District, but only one in a thousand of
> the applications ever becomes public, newly released data show. The
> bare-bones release by the courts leaves unanswered how long, in what
> ways and for what crimes federal investigators tracked individuals'
> data and whether long-running investigations result in charges. In
> Northern Virginia, electronic surveillance requests increased 500
> percent in the past five years, from 305 in 2011 to a pace set to pass
> 1,800 this year. Only one of the total 4,113 applications in those
> five years had been unsealed as of late July, according to information
> from the Alexandria division of the U.S. District Court for the
> Eastern District of Virginia, which covers northern Virginia. The
> report adds: "The federal court for the District of Columbia had 235
> requests in 2012, made by the local U.S. attorney's office. By 2013,
> requests in the District had climbed 240 percent, to about 564,
> according to information released by the court's chief judge and
> clerk. Three of the 235 applications from 2012 have been unsealed. The
> releases from the Washington-area courts list applications by law
> enforcement to federal judges asking to track data -- but not
> eavesdrop -- on users' electronic communications. That data can
> include sender and recipient information, and the time, date, duration
> and size of calls, emails, instant messages and social media messages,
> as well as device identification numbers and some website
> information."
>