Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube
John Newman
jnn at synfin.org
Mon Oct 17 17:21:07 PDT 2016
It's mildly tempting to make a substantive reply to your continued nonsense. But I said I was bowing out, and so I am ;). None of your rebuttals are worth the continued effort anyway, Juan. My time is better spent doing ANYTHING else.
I do appreciate the props on my old comments on propaganda :)
take care
John
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 11:30 AM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:18:26 -0400
> John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:13 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've never seen you make any interesting technical points,
>>>
>>> So now you changed from "technical points" to "interesting
>>> technical points"
>>>
>>> You don't need to further embarras yourself, but you are
>>> likely to….
>>
>> Playing simple word games, Juan? That seems about your speed.
>> My point remains the same, and un-refuted.
>
>
> You don't have a point. By the way, as far as I can tell your
> second post to this list is about....the global warming scam. Go
> figure. At least counting posts coming from synfin.org.
>
> Now, feel free to link all your 'technical', 'relevant' and
> 'useful' posts to the list. Especially 'technical'. Not that you
> are under any obligation to post pseudo technical garbage, but
> since apparently you love it so much, one would expect you to
> post a lot of it? Seems not. Tsk tsk.
>
> Then again, I'm glad you don't practice what you preach =)
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> or anything else. When it comes to tor you're like a fucking broken
>>>> IRC bot, spouting the SAME SHIT WE ALL KNOW,
>>>
>>> Oh really.
>>
>> Yep.
>
> "We" all know. So who is "we"? Whose spokesperson are you? Or
> whose talking head?
>
> Ah yes, since you can't speak for yourself you now invoke some
> kind of imaginary gang. Or perhaps you are referring to the
> 'community' of corrupt 'hackers' and the like, on the
> pentagon's payroll? Of course "you all" know that...
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nobody seems to know what I'm saying. If they did, they
>>> would act otherwise. Oh wait, they are complicit?
>>
>> Everyone knows.
>
>
> You can't answer the question...Or don't want to =)
>
>
>> Everyone with half a fucking brain. If they don’t,
>> it’s only because you’ve obscured the real issues with tor
>
>
> Oh, now it's my fault. My powers are amazing eh. Just because
> of some messages I post in a couple of small lists, I've
> turned the whole world into complicit assholes. I must be jesus
> or something - that's why I have superpowers!
>
> And what are the 'real' issues according to you anyway? Not that
> tor is a scam funded by the pentagon eh? That's not a real
> issue I guess...? Or is that the issue I've 'obscured'? Or what.
>
> Yeah, not expecting you to say anything reasonable at this
> point...
>
>
>
>> with your
>> over the top TORBOT TORBOT TORBOT responses any time the
>> word is mentioned.
>
>
> You are starting to sound like a torbot john. You were a tor
> accomplice too, no?
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> I've seen your posts, they are not technical in nature.
>>>
>>> Hey stupid piece of shit, this list is about crpyo ANARCHY.
>>
>> Right, but I’m talking about your hatred for the CRYPTO list, you ass.
>
>
> And I'm talking about a bunch of censors and establishment
> clowns pretending to be against it. I can also talk about your
> love for a bunch of censors. So?
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> You
>>>> don't have to be such a defensive ass about it, but hey, you think
>>>> climate change is a hoax too, so I'd say you are basically a
>>>> fucking lost cause at this point.
>>>
>>>
>>> I say you are an ignorant nerd who thinks that any sort of
>>> pseudo technical bullshit is Holy Science. You are just a
>>> recycled christian.
>>
>> You like to use the word nerd to describe anyone interested in
>> technical matters?
>
>
> No, I'm using it that way with you. Looks like you can't even
> read? I bothered to qualify "nerd" for your especial kind =)
>
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Pro censorship peie of shit, parroting pro-censorship
>>> propaganda in 'cryto' 'anarchsit' circles.
>>>
>>> You are a…hoax.
>>
>>
>> I never said anything pro-censorship.
>
>
> Except for supporting the censoring 'policies' of the
> 'cryptography' mailing cesspool. Come on. You can't be that
> stupid...or dishonest.
>
>
>>
>> I said YOU DONT GET TO DECIDE HOW OTHER PEOPLE CONFIGURE
>> THEIR SOFTWARE. It’s not UP TO YOU, jackass. I’ve never endorsed
>> moderation for this list.
>
> Not for this list. Did I say you endorse it for this list? No I
> didn't, lying retard. On the other hand, have you talked
> against people like quinn? Well you didn't do that either...
>
> At any rate, you endorse it for the 'cryptography' mailing list.
> So how retarded can you be to say something in one message and
> try to deny it in the next one?
>
> "OTHER PEOPLE CONFIGURE THEIR SOFTWARE"
>
> Isn't software 'free'? Oh, 'free' software gives 'admins' the
> divine right to censorship. You make so much sense...
>
>
>
>>
>> And parroting the lines others have just thrown at you gets you no
>> points (“You are a… hoax”)
>
>
> You are a hoax John. A pro-censorship hoax. Oh wait, I can't
> use that line? It's been copyright by the PDF Philosopher
> Mirimir? Sorry, please don't sue!
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> At any rate, your reaction to russian propaganda doesn't speak
>>>>> too well of you, just like it doesn't speak too well of Google
>>>>> Inc. representatives.
>>>>
>>>> And your reaction speaks volumes about you. First you replied by
>>>> immediately throwing your comrades under the bus,
>>>
>>> Except they are not my comrades.
>>
>> The list archives would seem to say otherwise.
>
>
> No, only liars say otherwise.
>
> Here's my take on russia...qouted by one "John Newman". And
> agreed with! =)
>
> https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2016-June/029267.html
>
>
> By the way, first you accuse me of being part of a circle jerk
> that posts russian propaganda. But if deny it (and you know the
> accusation is false), then I'm throwing my comrades under the
> bus. So whether I am pro-russia...or not...I'm guilty anyway =)
>
> You should get a job as state prosecutor...
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> now you seem to
>>>> want back in the circle jerk?
>>>
>>> What about you don't having a clue, and either not
>>> understanding my position or just lying about it.
>>>
>>> Bottom line you are way more pro amerikka thatn I'm pro
>>> russia. Hardly surprising sice you are an americunt.
>>
>> You argue like a child. I’m “more pro-america” than you are
>> “pro-russia”… which is utter fucking bullshit, and I think you know
>> it. Show one time I’ve ever endorsed america.
>
>
> You seem to be trying the "everybody is as bad as the U.S."
> line.
>
> If that's not the case, you could have dealt with the stuff Zen
> posts in a rational way. You didn't. Your mistake.
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This entire thread is such a fucking waste of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> So go fuck yourself. I'm sure you can write a three line
>>> bash script to hack the NSA. Go for it.
>>
>> Same to you Juan :)
>
>
> I'm not delusional and think the NSA can be 'hacked' =)
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Is there ANYONE on this list that you haven’t gotten into a massive
>> flame war with? Anyone besides your Russian Alex-Jones-loving
>> “global warming is a hoax" comrades, I mean…. You have to ask
>> yourself, when its you against EVERYONE, is the problem really with
>> EVERYONE else, or is the problem, perhaps, with YOU ?
>
>
> Oh yes. I'm not "well adapted" to your circle jerk of fake
> 'hackers' on the pentagon's payroll and Leading Establishment
> Americunts like those of the crypto ML.
>
>
> You want people to parrot only what the gang leaders allow to
> be parroted eh John? That's the reason why you 'love' the fully
> censored 'cryptography' mailing list =)
>
>
>>
>> I’m done talking to you. Respond if you want, but I’m not wasting
>> any more time on your fucking nonsense.
>
>
> At least it makes more sense than your own nonsense =)
>
> Like I said, now show what amazing hacker you are and how you
> are going to hack the pentagon...Focus on the 'technical'
> stuff...
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> John
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list