The difference between moderation and censorship [was Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate...]

[Razer]

On 10/15/2016 07:04 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:37:12 -0700
> Razer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 10/15/2016 03:41 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 22:24 -0300, #$%& wrote:
>>>> To be more precise. Expect to find absolutely no russian
>>>>         propaganda, because that list is fully 'moderated'. That
>>>> is, censored. And expect it to contain loads of american
>>>>         propaganda, which the 'moderators', aka censors, simply
>>>> consider
>>>>         to be 'ontopic' 'morally perfect' 'legitimate' 'content'.
>>>
>>> Moderation is not censorship. Moderation is the selective approval
>>> of messages so that a forum is not effectively censored by the
>>> prevalence of off-topic material, and to maintain standards of
>>> decorum and conduct. 
>>>
>>> Moderation, when done properly, is actually the *prevention* of
>>> constructive censorship. If this list were to be overrun by spam for
>>> knock-off Ray-Ban and Oakley sunglasses, penis enlargement pills,
>>> Dr. Oz approved acai berry diet pills, or even ads for VPNs that
>>> accept payments in Bitcoin, I'm sure most of you would demand
>>> something be done to protect the integrity of the forum.
>>>
>>
>> I agree with that. Absolutely. It stops about there too.
> 
> 
> 
> 	What do you agree with, exactly? You agree with quinn's fascist
> 	vomits? 
> 
> 


Try here, for what I EXACTLY agree with.
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2016-October/032938.html

Rr