[WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

[xorcist at sigaint.org]

>
> You changed the topic. You lose.

Your assertion about Russian in 1917 was false. Period.

You then picked up by ignoring that basic point, where you were wrong, and
focusing on one dubious point claiming that a discriminatory law isn't
discriminatory because... reasons. Some 'reason' somehow related to some
other law related to material in regards to prostitution.

YOU CHANGED the topic from homosexuality, and issues related to it - to
bringing up prostitution.

So, if a tangential point somehow makes you "lose" .. then, you lose on
three points, rather than just two. Congratulations:

1. Your assertion regarding the Russian Revolution in 1917, and its
effects on homosexuals was wrong.

2. You lack the basic intellectual honesty to even address the point
regarding Stalin in 1933.

3. YOU tangentially brought up prostitution, and laws related to
propaganda against it, instead of focusing on the real point: Stalin.
1933.