Intercept Greenwald Klein Talk Waffling Full Disclosure

[Razer]

On 10/19/2016 12:45 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> https://theintercept.com/2016/10/19/is-disclosure-of-podestas-emails-a-step-too-far-a-conversation-with-naomi-klein/
> youtube-dl https://soundcloud.com/the_intercept/disclosure_glennnaomi_v1
> 
> Some news organizations, including The Intercept, have devoted
> substantial resources to reporting on the newsworthy aspects of the
> archive of emails of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta that was
> published last week by WikiLeaks. Numerous documents from that archive
> have shed considerable light on the thought processes and previously
> secret behavior of top Clinton campaign aides and often the candidate
> herself. While the significance of particular stories has been
> debated, there is no denying that many of those disclosures offer a
> valuable glimpse into campaign operatives who currently exercise great
> political power and who, as of January of next year, are likely to be
> among the most powerful officials on the planet.
> 
> Despite her agreement with those propositions, the author and activist
> Naomi Klein believes there are serious threats to personal privacy and
> other critical political values posed by hacks of this sort,
> particularly when accompanied by the indiscriminate publication of
> someone’s personal emails.
> 


That's the downside of having power in a corporatist shitstem and it
applies to their whore politicians too. Hillary Clinton is a public
person in a high profile position. She HAS NO "Personal emails" afaic.
Just like a corporate director has to get up at 3 am while in mid-fuck
of some prostitute he hired for the night and get on a plane to 'put out
a fire' threatening the corporation, someone whose secretary of state or
president HAS NO PRIVATE LIFE.

Nor should they.

Rr