Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

[Mirimir]

On 10/14/2016 11:51 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:46 -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>>> No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting.
>>> Something to think about.
>>>
>>> Reposting email clearly intended to be private is often in poor taste,
>>> even if technically legal. Especially if it is explicit in nature, as
>>> this one was.
>>
>> Well, except that this is a totally unmoderated list. Which is a good
>> thing, I believe. So it's all on Razer.
> 
> My points with that statement about a moderator were:
> 1. The original should never have been posted. 
> 2. An unmoderated list means the participants themselves are supposed to
> moderate their postings, and because posts like the original are making
> it on to the list anyway, clearly this is failing.

Clearly.

> Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the list
> to begin with, such as the explicit garbage clearly never intended for
> public consumption which I was originally replying to?

Those are my values.