"Tor is dead technology"

Steve Kinney admin at pilobilus.net
Tue Oct 4 09:39:17 PDT 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 10/03/2016 09:59 PM, Razer wrote:
> The poster of that tweet, @thegrugq, 'security researcher',  also
> said: "the government doesn’t use Tor."
> 
> https://twitter.com/attractr/status/783014723226861568
> 
> Comments?

"I was familiar with TOR and had it previously installed on a computer
to anonymously monitor the social media website of militia groups
operating within central Iraq." - Chelsea Manning, March 2013

So as of 2009 or so, U.S. Army intelligence was still using TOR for
its originally stated purpose.  I have not seen any indications that
they have something better today; against its intended targets, TOR
"just works."  TOR has a daily user base of 1-3/4 to 2 million, a fair
sized crowd to hide in.  The likely alternative would be to
impersonate a "normal" user via a fast VPN connection set up to spoof
one's location and identity - and I am sure the intel services are all
set up for that, where and as they have reasons to look perfectly
normal vs. standing out as TOR users.




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJX89s1AAoJEECU6c5XzmuqqhsH/RwOEpjq8YPBcVGZFmScsxFy
gS/QzjHwwtskYUoLOnUSJsERF9LA/2Gn+9LUKjP/X96LzIfsv5IYtSTCCvVktL26
U6RlPSECntw/s8rV2h8I9ChitMsU4s3LANQrNy+aGv7A5J8A4X0z6RReEGdQS8+J
vYEF2Ta94q56g0+aArijKg3wdCTsD8ABrRlH8qRsTbBsaAlMx58+MH4xZJtER5ed
jyF8YOD/LJj/GZS/a9F03sVTerNuuHz2+JGf56j8Iuz800Q7lLzX6hX842fdoZmh
IDPVA8rnQAjX7sUnodQK7/JtjxL7xHuSMzkHvPNVaFNtlMvWS682HmXjwTohG4g=
=mI2e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list