Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 3 17:31:24 PDT 2016
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 00:02:53 -0000
xorcist at sigaint.org wrote:
> > Let me SPELL IT OUT for you, RETARD. I didn't deny I was
> > typing on a computer (as a matter of fact, I use a desktop
> > computer). I denied being in the "1%". GET IT now?
>
> Wait, I lost track.
Really. And when were you on track, exactly?
> Are we talking about wealth, or intelligence?
I know what I'm talking about but you don't know what you are
talking about. You seem to have some kind of problem...
>
> Because I agree that neither of us are in the 1% of the most
> intelligent. That much is obvious.
Intelligence was never mentioned...
>
> As for wealth, you're saying you make less than $32000 / USD a year?
It's none of your business actually, but my income is a lot
less than that.
>
> And you bought a desktop computer, AND a phone?
Here's another fact that's none of your business, but I'll
mention anyway. I don' have a phone. I never had one =) - Yes,
I own some stuff includng a computer. No that doesn't mean I
belong to the 1% wealth-wise.
It now seems rather obvious that you don't know how to count,
at all.
Here's some advanced calculus for you : World population ~
7400 millions. What's the 1% of 7400? Why, it's 74 millions.
Now find out who those 74 million people are. Then try the 10%
group. That one should include most of the US and europe...et
cetera.
> And you pay for all
> the bandwidth for your 'musings' here ??
>
> How fucking stupid. You're never going to get ahead that way.
>
> Ok. I believe you. You're not in the 1% of either intelligence, or
> wealth.
I think you should work harder trying to understand the meaning
of the relative position of 0s, 1s and the rest of arabic
numerals...
>
> I stand corrected.
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list