Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 3 13:08:21 PDT 2016


On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:58:03 -0400
Steve Kinney <admin at pilobilus.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/03/2016 08:36 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org wrote:
> > 
> >> By-the-way, I saw somebody on the interwebz suggesting that 
> >> trump's job is to get the cunt elected. The idea is to have 
> >> somebody like trump to point at and say "look! the murderous cunt
> >> is better than him!". Sounds sorta plausible. At least if your
> >> target audience is 'progressive' 'politically correct' fascists,
> >> who are the majority of the US electorate apparently.
> > 
> > Yeah, a friend of mine is in that camp.
> > 
> > Plausible? Quite. But too conspiratorial for me. I tend to believe
> > that human stupidity is a larger force than conspiracy.
> > 
> > I may, however, simply be being stupid.
> 
> I see what you did there.  ;o)
> 
> But that's not stupid.  Just cautious.  Collusion between Clinton and
> Trump makes complete sense, but in the absence of evidence directly
> confirming it one should not "believe" it. 


	What kind of evidence, exactly, you think is needed? That's
	not just a rhetorical question.

	As a matter of fact, the US has a one party rule system with
	the One Party being composed of two factions, for appearances'
	sake. (all 'democratic' systems work roughly that way of course)

	You could argue that there's no formal secret agreement
	between the two factions, but if you did, perhaps you
	should provide proofs for the claim? 

	At any rate it is obvious that even if the formal
	agreement doesn't exist, the factions operate under a
	tacit agreement.



> Most people can not avoid
> conflating a speculative model that does fit the facts, with the facts
> themselves. Intelligence services do all they can to train their
> personnel out of that habit, with limited success.

> 
> There is also a wild card factor:  It is reasonable to presume that
> Clinton really is psychotic, Trump really is profoundly neurotic, and
> that either would turn on the other under the right kind of pressure.
>  This leads to all kinds of amusing speculation:  Is it even possible
> that Trump could keep such a deal, vs. double crossing Clinton and
> trying to win the election by any means necessary?  How much
> temptation can a narcissistic personality resist?
> 
> "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet
> it was planned that way." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
> 
> To this day, State sanctioned history books do not mention Roosevelt's
> well documented and brilliantly successful "plan" to provoke the
> Japanese to declare war on the United States.  This was as much a
> covert military operation as a series of foreign policy moves:  It
> included close monitoring Japan's own plans and force deployments, and
> timely changes in U.S. force deployments to facilitate the unopposed
> Pearl Harbor attack while preserving U.S. aircraft carriers.


	Conspiracy! You probably believe in lizards from the 6th
	dimension and DON'T believe in the superpowers of our savior
	jew-kkkrist. 


> 
> History is fossilized propaganda.
> 
> :o)
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJX8qo7AAoJEECU6c5XzmuqD/0H/R4ttEEfjnnvgje17tZxWzzD
> MjiC6duEPwCn3fmOQv5FaH9pJNCFQZC6PLpnrzZ4OMrKVdAsxJCQja2iacGgw+KB
> nIbNzghHSqxOWueRlnLiPPI2qayS7IrwonKE5pFTY2vGW58CjZRGDNTbRaVOW2A/
> A945vz/kyJ+qMqqHe3xTrY5e6GPsl3MJMuB3PJBFC93voRT88+l+IDrU2dQUEBNs
> s8ZUgtPAVJnSRp/Sp1E5CQy4Gaz2LNryX0nh55/2HqKKfDw83zqFCJqjYbHUe2Nq
> 2hVYcj25cN9szMShp6kkVCq/db/U23sts+Rbv0kQ658buipeLbNCrrrVXKy923Y=
> =2zPt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list