Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news

John Newman jnn at synfin.org
Tue Nov 29 09:29:35 PST 2016


To clarify ; you're a waste of time.

I made a mistake (have made many actually) responding to you Zen.  

My bad.

--
John

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org <xorsict at sigaint.org> wrote:
>>>> John Newman:
>>>> read the links you sent?
>>> 
>>> They ar as Zordon suggested
>>> 
>>> "Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East
>>> Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year,
>>> while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the
>>> Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year"
>>> 
>>> "They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of
>>> years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East
>>> Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time"
>> 
>> And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been
>> happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the
>> article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be
>> false.
>> 
>> Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I
>> said, bullshit.
> 
> John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject:
> "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good
> news"
> 
> Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of
> underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models).
> 
> Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the
> bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a
> little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to
> make compensatory consideration for your limitations.
> 
> 
>>>> full of shit
> 
> John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you
> understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive
> responses can also be made.
> 
> This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd
> funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to
> draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd
> probably draw it somewhat like "666".
> 
> 
> Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed
> in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may
> assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know,
> like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better
> that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for
> your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/
> 
> 
> My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying
> for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing
> my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best
> interest.
> 
> 
> Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a
> substantive response - railing against seekers because their
> seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response
> program is unlikely to raise the dailog,
> Zenaan
> Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning
> 
> 
> -- 
> Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C)
>        Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning
>  Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list