Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!

[juan]

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:28:21 -0500
grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Razer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> > [?]
> 
> Well, those are the practical everyday questions people
> like Juan refuse to answer and explain the potential
> workings


	That is not how it works =) A few points in no particular
	order : 

	a) I am under no obligation to explain anything

	b) there are TONS of literature dealing with political
	philosophy

	c) utilitarianism is a joke 

	d) at any rate, it's aggressors who should be doing the
	explaining. People who support the state's authority should
	provide the 'rational' basis for their obey-or-die 'philosophy'

	Let's say A point a gun at B and then the following
	dialog ensues :

	A : I want to buy ice-cream. Give me money or I'll kill you.

	B : what the fuck? 

	A : I need money, so give me your money. 

	B : are you nuts? 

	A : No, I want ice-cream. How can I can buy ice-cream if I
	don't have money? 

	B : I don't know. That's not my problem. 

	A : Look I'm being rational. You have to solve my problems. If
	you don't want to be robed and/or raped and/or killed, YOU have
	to 'explain' 

	B : why?

	
	A : and AND, but BUT WHO WOULD PICK THE COTTON?



> of to people who might then vote for his nobodys.
> If you want a vote you have to put it in everyday practical terms.
> No offense to the Juans's out there, just saying.

	No problem. I just explained why it's a mistake to demand
	explanations =P