Scientific Progress

John Newman jnn at synfin.org
Sat Nov 5 20:17:13 PDT 2016


Wow, you really took an interest in the fact that I used the word dialectics. Did you learn a new word?

All your repeated dishonest blathering has gotten repetitive (big fucking surprise).

I leave you to your cesspool =).  Enjoy it, you pedantic twit.


John

> On Nov 5, 2016, at 2:53 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 07:11:30 -0400
> John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 5:20 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> russian propaganda.
>>>  I simply ignore it.
>> 
>> You certainly do. Blatant statist bullshit pours into and through the
>> list and Juan the protector simply ignores it.
> 
> 
>    Yep, and that annoys people like you =)
> 
>    Notice that I'm not the only one in the list who isn't bothered
>    by russian propaganda or that openly acknowledges that you
>    americunts are the ones messing with the russians. 
> 
>    You on the other hand seem to blatantly ignore the existence of
>    your americunt empire and its actions... 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> But if someone mentions global warming.... or science at a
>> professional level (and Russia has universities too), watch the fuck
>> out. Someone's about to get called americunt =)
>> 
>>>  But of course, I'm not going to do your job, you dumb lefty
>>>  americunt. My beef is with scumbags like you - a me ri cunts.
>>>  There are no pro-russia local facists in argentina. There are
>>>  lots of pro-amerikkka fascists tho.
>> 
>> Oh, I see. You have a remarkable ability to distinguish amongst and
>> identify different types of fascists. It's good to know someone is
>> keeping Argentina pure. (lol)
> 
>    
>    argentina is a fascist cesspool and virtual colonoy of your
>    americunt empire - I never suggested there's anything 'pure'
>    about argentina. Only a retard like you would get a different
>    idea.
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>  americunts like you don't like to be called americunts - that's
>>>  a great reason to point out that you are an ameriCUNT.
>> 
>> And you're just a cunt, but I don't need to say it 13 times per
>> message =).  
> 
>    your choice =)
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Particularly as I've 
>>>> never had a single good word to say for America, or any other
>>>> nation state. As you know of course, you dishonest fuck.
>>> 
>>>  As I said you are way more pro ameriKKKA than I'm pro russia.
>>>  But since you are a dishonest fuck... =)
>> 
>> You simply ignore Russian fascism - you just said so. You give it a
>> pass. It doesn't bother you in the least.
> 
>    I said I ignore the dumb russian propaganda on the list - That
>    I give russian fascism a pass is just a lie on your part.
> 
>    And I'll remark again that some of it is not even propaganda.
>    For instance, only dumb americunts would believe that the
>    russians hacked the democratic fascist party. 
> 
>    But no doubt, a    fascist americunt would  equate
>    "not-believing-US-propaganda" with "giving-the-russians-a-pass"
> 
> 
>> 
>> I'm not pro any nation state. I don't give Russia or America a pass.
> 
>    Too bad that's a blatant lie. You support state 'science',  so
>    you 'give a pass' to all nation states on the planet. You just
>    do it in slightly underhanded way. 
> 
> 
>> Again, you argue like a child, so I'm indulging you like a child.  
> 
>    lol...As if that was an insult.
> 
> 
> 
>>> 
>>>  Notice stupid scumbag how you both cheer for NATION STATE
>>>  'science' while denying that you are a pro nation state statist 
>>>  cunt. 
>>> 
>>>  Yep, you are rather stupid john...
>> 
>> I said :
>> 
>> science is real. 
>> I don't know everything.
>> And I implied there have been useful advances from university level
>> sciences.
> 
>    Yes, and? All statist retards (like you) 'know' that given
>    enough subsidies, the parasites who get them might do something
>    'useful' once in a while. So fucking what. 
> 
>    I already addressed the point in the discussion with Tom. The
>    very same discussion full of points you can counter, and which
>    led you to start whining and call me a 'hypocrite' =)
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> I realize your chihuahua sized brain has problems with complex
>> thoughts, but I wonder what part of that counts as cheerleading?
> 
> 
>    What are you doing, exactly, if not cheerleading for
>    statist 'science' when all you have to reply to somebody
>    criticizing it, is : 
> 
>    "you are typying on a computer"  (as if that meant anything).
> 
> 
>    You should apply that line of 'reasoning' to yourself. ANY
>    criticism of the establishment, done using ANY medium that
>    fucktards like you think exist thanks to the state is invalid.
> 
>    Is the thought too complex for you? Again : Using anything that
>    had anything to do with any subsidy invalidates any argument
>    against the establishmet (in your deranged mind)
> 
>    And what's the logical conclusion of that absurd premise? Why,
>    you either become a pro-establishment, or you are a 'hypocrite'.
> 
>    Are you going to call this 'dialectics'? Oh, wait : 
> 
>    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dialectics
> 
>    " The art or practice of arriving at the truth by the exchange
>    of logical arguments." 
> 
>    No wonder you would use 'dialectics' as a derogative term.
> 
> 
> 
>> Yep, you are completely full of shit Juan....
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I find it hilarious how much you disparage the crypto list.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Yes, I fail to appreciate its cosmic virtue, namely CENSORSHIP.
>>>  A virtue you fully embrace, like a good dumb americunt.
>> 
>> There is a difference between censorship and a moderated technical
>> mailing list.
> 
>    You are sick piece of shit John =) 
> 
>    You are seriously trying to 'argue' along the lines of "war is
>    peace" and trying to sell CENSORSHIP by changing its name. 
> 
>    That's both highly stupid and obviously a core totalitarian
>    value that one would think is not a 'cypherpunk' value.
> 
>    Who else advocates 'moderation' aka censorship here? Why, your
>    fascist american brother quinn. That should tell you
>    something....
> 
> 
>> Kind of like no sane person would give you commit privs
>> to any source code, anywhere. 
>> 
>> The idea that an individual list admin's agency, in the configuration
>> of their own software, is dictated by Juan and his central committee
>> - that's fascism.
> 
> 
>    Sure. Free specech is fascism. That's the kind of  thought that
>    fascist cunts like you freely utter with a straight face. Only
>    americunt anti-culture can produce bots like you John =)
> 
> 
>    It's also funny that you are fully aligned with the most
>    right-wing right wingers and their "my home my rules" slogan.
> 
> 
> 
>> But Ive pointed this out to you before.
>> 
>> Again, I wouldn't expect your over excited little frontal lobe,
>> clearly suffering from serious deformity, to understand. 
>> 
>> And I still invite the "cesspool" comparison. This list has become a
>> fucking cesspool, aided and abetted by you and your comrades.
> 
> 
>    Damn, Progressive American John is threatened by the russians!
>    Call homeland security and maccarthy now!!!
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> John
> 




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list