Scientific Progress
John Newman
jnn at synfin.org
Sat Nov 5 20:17:13 PDT 2016
Wow, you really took an interest in the fact that I used the word dialectics. Did you learn a new word?
All your repeated dishonest blathering has gotten repetitive (big fucking surprise).
I leave you to your cesspool =). Enjoy it, you pedantic twit.
John
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 2:53 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 07:11:30 -0400
> John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 5:20 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> russian propaganda.
>>> I simply ignore it.
>>
>> You certainly do. Blatant statist bullshit pours into and through the
>> list and Juan the protector simply ignores it.
>
>
> Yep, and that annoys people like you =)
>
> Notice that I'm not the only one in the list who isn't bothered
> by russian propaganda or that openly acknowledges that you
> americunts are the ones messing with the russians.
>
> You on the other hand seem to blatantly ignore the existence of
> your americunt empire and its actions...
>
>
>
>>
>> But if someone mentions global warming.... or science at a
>> professional level (and Russia has universities too), watch the fuck
>> out. Someone's about to get called americunt =)
>>
>>> But of course, I'm not going to do your job, you dumb lefty
>>> americunt. My beef is with scumbags like you - a me ri cunts.
>>> There are no pro-russia local facists in argentina. There are
>>> lots of pro-amerikkka fascists tho.
>>
>> Oh, I see. You have a remarkable ability to distinguish amongst and
>> identify different types of fascists. It's good to know someone is
>> keeping Argentina pure. (lol)
>
>
> argentina is a fascist cesspool and virtual colonoy of your
> americunt empire - I never suggested there's anything 'pure'
> about argentina. Only a retard like you would get a different
> idea.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> americunts like you don't like to be called americunts - that's
>>> a great reason to point out that you are an ameriCUNT.
>>
>> And you're just a cunt, but I don't need to say it 13 times per
>> message =).
>
> your choice =)
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Particularly as I've
>>>> never had a single good word to say for America, or any other
>>>> nation state. As you know of course, you dishonest fuck.
>>>
>>> As I said you are way more pro ameriKKKA than I'm pro russia.
>>> But since you are a dishonest fuck... =)
>>
>> You simply ignore Russian fascism - you just said so. You give it a
>> pass. It doesn't bother you in the least.
>
> I said I ignore the dumb russian propaganda on the list - That
> I give russian fascism a pass is just a lie on your part.
>
> And I'll remark again that some of it is not even propaganda.
> For instance, only dumb americunts would believe that the
> russians hacked the democratic fascist party.
>
> But no doubt, a fascist americunt would equate
> "not-believing-US-propaganda" with "giving-the-russians-a-pass"
>
>
>>
>> I'm not pro any nation state. I don't give Russia or America a pass.
>
> Too bad that's a blatant lie. You support state 'science', so
> you 'give a pass' to all nation states on the planet. You just
> do it in slightly underhanded way.
>
>
>> Again, you argue like a child, so I'm indulging you like a child.
>
> lol...As if that was an insult.
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Notice stupid scumbag how you both cheer for NATION STATE
>>> 'science' while denying that you are a pro nation state statist
>>> cunt.
>>>
>>> Yep, you are rather stupid john...
>>
>> I said :
>>
>> science is real.
>> I don't know everything.
>> And I implied there have been useful advances from university level
>> sciences.
>
> Yes, and? All statist retards (like you) 'know' that given
> enough subsidies, the parasites who get them might do something
> 'useful' once in a while. So fucking what.
>
> I already addressed the point in the discussion with Tom. The
> very same discussion full of points you can counter, and which
> led you to start whining and call me a 'hypocrite' =)
>
>
>
>>
>> I realize your chihuahua sized brain has problems with complex
>> thoughts, but I wonder what part of that counts as cheerleading?
>
>
> What are you doing, exactly, if not cheerleading for
> statist 'science' when all you have to reply to somebody
> criticizing it, is :
>
> "you are typying on a computer" (as if that meant anything).
>
>
> You should apply that line of 'reasoning' to yourself. ANY
> criticism of the establishment, done using ANY medium that
> fucktards like you think exist thanks to the state is invalid.
>
> Is the thought too complex for you? Again : Using anything that
> had anything to do with any subsidy invalidates any argument
> against the establishmet (in your deranged mind)
>
> And what's the logical conclusion of that absurd premise? Why,
> you either become a pro-establishment, or you are a 'hypocrite'.
>
> Are you going to call this 'dialectics'? Oh, wait :
>
> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dialectics
>
> " The art or practice of arriving at the truth by the exchange
> of logical arguments."
>
> No wonder you would use 'dialectics' as a derogative term.
>
>
>
>> Yep, you are completely full of shit Juan....
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I find it hilarious how much you disparage the crypto list.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I fail to appreciate its cosmic virtue, namely CENSORSHIP.
>>> A virtue you fully embrace, like a good dumb americunt.
>>
>> There is a difference between censorship and a moderated technical
>> mailing list.
>
> You are sick piece of shit John =)
>
> You are seriously trying to 'argue' along the lines of "war is
> peace" and trying to sell CENSORSHIP by changing its name.
>
> That's both highly stupid and obviously a core totalitarian
> value that one would think is not a 'cypherpunk' value.
>
> Who else advocates 'moderation' aka censorship here? Why, your
> fascist american brother quinn. That should tell you
> something....
>
>
>> Kind of like no sane person would give you commit privs
>> to any source code, anywhere.
>>
>> The idea that an individual list admin's agency, in the configuration
>> of their own software, is dictated by Juan and his central committee
>> - that's fascism.
>
>
> Sure. Free specech is fascism. That's the kind of thought that
> fascist cunts like you freely utter with a straight face. Only
> americunt anti-culture can produce bots like you John =)
>
>
> It's also funny that you are fully aligned with the most
> right-wing right wingers and their "my home my rules" slogan.
>
>
>
>> But Ive pointed this out to you before.
>>
>> Again, I wouldn't expect your over excited little frontal lobe,
>> clearly suffering from serious deformity, to understand.
>>
>> And I still invite the "cesspool" comparison. This list has become a
>> fucking cesspool, aided and abetted by you and your comrades.
>
>
> Damn, Progressive American John is threatened by the russians!
> Call homeland security and maccarthy now!!!
>
>
>>
>>
>> John
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list