What Omidyar's been up to...
carimachet at gmail.com
Tue May 17 14:15:57 PDT 2016
Thank you rayzor for your ignorant ego ways otherwise we wouldnt get to
read juans brilliance as often
On May 17, 2016 11:20 PM, "juan" <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2016 08:13:44 -0700
Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 10:36 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 May 2016 08:35:28 -0700
> > Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> >> Fomenting media about indigenous land rights...
> > omidyar and the reuters mafia babbling about 'land rights' make as
> > much sense as jack the ripper lecturing on morality.
> I sense you, like many fanatics, don't see the value of the 'small
> cracks' these sorts of things make in 'systems'.
Oh, I do see the value of what your master omidyar does. I know
qute well how propaganda works.
The 'cracks' in the system are useful to keep the fake
opposition happy. "Controlled opposition" Look it up. In
> Let's talk conspiracy Juan, cause I KNOW you're bound to be one of
> those 'conspiracy nutjobs'.
Ok. So I'm a 'fanatic nutjob'. I'd rather be that instead of an
> "Power Elite Conspiracies" exist but they are NOT overarching, cast
> in stone things with some 'plan' that made them happen. Conspiracies
> muddle through by hedging all bets. Any way the cards fall you win
> SOMETHING, and over time that something is at least additive if not
> geometrically or logarithmically enhanced.
Handwaving and bullshit.
> It's up to the proles to take advantage of the hedges that work for
> them. Because no one else is going to do it. Even the most perverse
> skewed reporting on an issue is better than none at all for too many
> reasons to enumerate here.
Sure, sure, sure. How could I have missed the invaluable value
of establishment propaganda? Silly me.
> If the proles can't figure out the media trap their ensnared in
> educate them. You'd just scoff. Hella solution.
> "I think people have the capacities to see through the deceit in which
> they're ensnared, but you've got to make the effort" ~Noam Chomsky
> He says so right here >
> (snigger, that's Tom Morello's mama announcing.)
> Ah but you think Chomsky's a CIA 'operator' don't you Juan?
I know chomsky is a sick piece of shit. I aldready provided the
data. Here it goes again.
> And Tom Morello, and Zack De La Rocha, and Abbie Hoffman Karl Marx,
> Groucho Marx, and Trotsky too.
lol rayzer - you are a cheap marxist - you can't get more
totalitarian than that.
go kill people who don't obey The State's Traffic Laws.
> I guess everyone should just give up and not do anything at all.
> BTW, USAID is on the list of foundation donors. The skew is EASY to
> see, and EASY to work around just by those agency's visibility in the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 4870 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks