IBM Quantum Computing

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Fri May 6 15:31:16 PDT 2016


On Fri, 6 May 2016 14:58:52 -0700
Sean Lynch <seanl at literati.org> wrote:


> Depends on what you mean by "practical". Perhaps fewer applications
> due to the fact that you can only approximate the answer (with
> accuracy increasing as you increase the number of braids), but
> potentially more scalable because the braids are more stable. If
> IBM's computer can't be scaled up to the point that it's more than a
> toy, but TQCs can, then the TQC would be the practical one.

	Yes, that's the theory...In theory topological qbits could be
	produced in quantity, but in pactice not a
	single t. qbit has been built as far as I can tell.






More information about the cypherpunks mailing list