Hi, Boyce! (was Fwd: tor-talk subscription update)

[juan]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:33:33 -0500
"Shawn K. Quinn" <skquinn at rushpost.com> wrote:


> I am all for freedom of speech, but a list started for a specific
> purpose becomes useless if most, or even many, of the posts are
> off-topic. The tor-talk list (which I do not subscribe to) was started
> for a specific purpose, and allowing the continued posting of
> off-topic garbage 


	Virtually none of the posts were off-topic. They were all about
	tor, and as far as I was concerned tor's failure and
	misrepresentations.

	So, cut the 'off topic' fake excuse please. 



> defeats the whole purpose of having such a list.
> 
> I don't work for the US military or US government, but I support the
> TOr Project's and Graham Boyce's efforts to restore order to the list

	LOL - translation : I'm another fascist shitbag who supports
	the pentagon's fake anonimity network AND now OUTRIGHT
	CENSORSHIP. 


> in principle. Those who have threatened to rejoin the list under other
> identities have committed a despicable and reprehensible act 

	OK. That sounds like sarcasm because if that's not sarcasm you
	get the world prize in crazyness.



> and
> deserve the ban from the forum they have received. 
> 
> I will admit that sometimes our governments in the US sometimes get it
> wrong when passing laws. We as a nation have learned from our mistakes
> and the history of the laws reflect this. 

	Again either that's sarcasm, or I'm - almost - speechless.


> To infiltrate an e-mail list
> originated from private computer systems with off-topic posts, and
> then to threaten to continue doing so despite being banned from that
> list is against the law in most states and I believe violates Federal
> law as well. 

	You are starting to sound like a really crazy piece of shit...


> It is the right of the Tor Project and the people behind
> it to refuse to re-publish off-topic messages. To that effect, I
> support the Tor Project taking legal action against any such
> offenders if that becomes necessary.

	Yep. You are even way more crazy and despicable than your
	employeers. 

	What the fuck are you doing in a cypherpunk mailing list, apart
	from trolling and spying? 



> 
> Before anyone even asks, my beliefs are the same regardless of whether
> or not Jacob Applebaum is guilty of what he has been accused of. (I do
> consider it noteworthy that so far such accusations have only been
> made in the court of public opinion, not in any court of law.)
>