Hi, Boyce! (was Fwd: tor-talk subscription update)

[Cecilia Tanaka]

Hi again, Boyce.

I will re-subscribe and be on topic now.  You can moderate my messages to
be sure I will be strictly on topic, if you want.

I am humbly asking to return because there are some interesting subjects
there, about Tor Project in general.

Sorry for being deeply sincere, but mentioning "ludicrous rape apologetics"
makes really clear your beliefs and preferences.

Hope to be accepted again.

Cecilia
On Jun 22, 2016 6:23 PM, "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com> wrote:

> Boyce,
>
> I asked to Roger about the tor-talk moderation rules weeks ago and did not
> receive any answer.  I can send the message in private to you, if you don't
> believe.
>
> **  I was already raped twice and I do have deep physical and emotional
> scars.  Do you really think I loved my experiences and I deserve to be
> called "ludicrous rape apologetics"?  **
>
> I was talking about truth and lies, about judgements without proofs.  I
> was a real victim in the past, I didn't tell lies.  I know in my own burned
> skin what is being a victim of rape.  Please, you can offend my
> intelligence, but it is really injust and pretty sick to call me "rape
> apologetics".
>
> I bet you will leave ja.group post lies in tor-talk list, Boyce.  How
> about being *fair*, please?  I can create a fake account just for reading
> tor-talk list, but I prefer to use my own name and be transparent, expose
> myself when talking about lies.  So, the ja.group or any person can contact
> me if they really want to talk about the truth.
>
> Thanks for the answer, but you were unfair and really disgusting.
>
> Cecilia
> On Jun 22, 2016 6:03 PM, "Griffin Boyce" <griffin at cryptolab.net> wrote:
>
>> Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>>
>>> Boyce, please, just pro-Jake people were banned or it was just a
>>> lovely coincidence?  How about a bit of transparency, please?
>>>
>>
>> Hello Cecilia,
>>
>>   This is the relevant thread on tor-project:
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-June/000459.html
>>
>>   As you can see, the emphasis is on off-topic posts and not the members'
>> personal beliefs.  Though having my inbox overrun with more than 300
>> messages filled with the most ludicrous rape apologetics was certainly a
>> factor in my decision to ask for the ability to remove subscribers.
>>
>> juan wrote:
>>
>>> >       I'm obviously re-subscribing right now. The fuck is wrong
>>>> > with you.
>>>>
>>>> You're banned. Go elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>>         so you work for the department of defense, eh shitbag? Too
>>>         stupid and coward to even admit it =)
>>>
>>
>>   Senpai isn't going to notice you bro.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3685 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160622/0978a19f/attachment-0002.txt>