Wikileaks is the Endgame

[juan]

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:07:56 -0700
Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 06/26/2016 06:08 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:27:51 -0700
> > Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> >
> >> DUDE IF YOU KNOW SOMETHING'S COMPROMISED YOU CAN WORK WITH THAT!
> >
> > 	But tor isn't compromised!! What are you talking about? Are
> > you trying to scare people off tor? 
> >
> > 	See what kind dishonest asshole you are rayzer? 
> 
> 
> Dishonest... Really? Show me the discrepancy in any position I've
> taken at ANY TIME ... Troll.


	From pretenting to be an anarchist who sucks the DMV's cock to
	being a torbot who now (maybe) admits he is promoting a
	'compromised' piece of garbage? 

	Your are too stupid rayzer - and dishonest. 

	
> 
> >
> >
> > 	And in reality, the idea that you can 'work' with the
> > 	compromised-by-design, pentagon's fake-anonimity network,
> > is the kind of nonsense that...gov't agents wanting to entrap people
> > 	would say.
> >
> > 	
> 
> Do tell. Some proof of that hypothesis Troll.

	
	What proof do I need for such self-evident fact, fucktard? You
	promote a fake-anomity network because that's the way to
	'compromise' people. Have them use a 'compromised' tool.

	And what kinf of fucktard would argue that 'compromised' tools
	are still useful? What's the point of ever fixing anything if
	'broken' tools 'work'.

	You can't be that fucking stupid rayzer. 



> 
> FWIW I CAN PROVE compromised networks STILL accomplish a lot. 


	Of course. They accomplish a lot for the people who compromised
	them. That's the whole point, fucktard. 





ANY
> ORGANIZATION, political, corporate, you-name-it that has ever been
> existed has been infiltrated by feds/other corporations,
> opposition ... yet SOMEHOW they manage to get some things done.
> 
> 
> Same applies to HumInt networks in war zones... Troll.
> 
> Same applies to Tor... It's not exceptional. Like you... Troll.
> 
> Rr
> 
> 
> >> I don't think anyone who actually uses tor as more than 'something
> >> their neighbour told them to try so they try it once' actually
> >> BELIEVES tor is the ultimate in anonymity but... (see the shouting
> >> at the top)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/26/2016 02:11 PM, John Young wrote:
> >>> WORD.
> >>>
> >>> At 05:02 PM 6/26/2016, juan wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 04:59:51 -0400
> >>>> grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/4pw7bz/tor_infiltrated_by_cia_agent/
> >>>>> http://pastebin.com/WPAmqkW8
> >>>>
> >>>>         This is more propaganada. It is to be expected from the
> >>>> likes of grarpamp.
> >>>>
> >>>>         It has some nice touches, like illustrating the ABC of so
> >>>> called 'public choice'. First objective of the tor cunts is to
> >>>> get money. And they do that by servicing the pentagon.
> >>>>
> >>>>         ALL of those shitbags are pentagon employees. Now. At
> >>>> this very moment.
> >>>>
> >>>>         Only retards would care about the fact that one of them
> >>>> also worked for the CIA. That is FUCKING IRRELEVANT.
> >>>>
> >>>>         Furthermore, what kind of moral authority do tor cunts
> >>>> have over a CIA employee. They are actually WORSE than the CIA.
> >>>> They are pretending to be the 'good guys' while they are FUCKING
> >>>> NOT. I
> >>>>         I can't believe the 'public' is so fucking retarded as to
> >>>> miss this point.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://0bin.net/paste/blHWhjY9CRGB8A5X#EArYlEpN1fvqLSclzCivmmIMf3iRMvCYhi++oVYwWFu
> >>>>> Just links.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
>