Hi, Boyce! (was Fwd: tor-talk subscription update)

[juan]

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:59:43 -0300
Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi again, Boyce.
> 
> I will re-subscribe and be on topic now.  You can moderate my
> messages to be sure I will be strictly on topic, if you want.

> 
> I am humbly asking to return because there are some interesting
> subjects there, about Tor Project in general.


	Wow. Are you begging those shitbags, and promising to be an
	obedient sheep? Disgusting.




> 
> Sorry for being deeply sincere, but mentioning "ludicrous rape
> apologetics" makes really clear your beliefs and preferences.
> 
> Hope to be accepted again.
> 
> Cecilia
> On Jun 22, 2016 6:23 PM, "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Boyce,
> >
> > I asked to Roger about the tor-talk moderation rules weeks ago and
> > did not receive any answer.  I can send the message in private to
> > you, if you don't believe.
> >
> > **  I was already raped twice and I do have deep physical and
> > emotional scars.  Do you really think I loved my experiences and I
> > deserve to be called "ludicrous rape apologetics"?  **
> >
> > I was talking about truth and lies, about judgements without
> > proofs.  I was a real victim in the past, I didn't tell lies.  I
> > know in my own burned skin what is being a victim of rape.  Please,
> > you can offend my intelligence, but it is really injust and pretty
> > sick to call me "rape apologetics".
> >
> > I bet you will leave ja.group post lies in tor-talk list, Boyce.
> > How about being *fair*, please?  I can create a fake account just
> > for reading tor-talk list, but I prefer to use my own name and be
> > transparent, expose myself when talking about lies.  So, the
> > ja.group or any person can contact me if they really want to talk
> > about the truth.
> >
> > Thanks for the answer, but you were unfair and really disgusting.
> >
> > Cecilia
> > On Jun 22, 2016 6:03 PM, "Griffin Boyce" <griffin at cryptolab.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> >>
> >>> Boyce, please, just pro-Jake people were banned or it was just a
> >>> lovely coincidence?  How about a bit of transparency, please?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hello Cecilia,
> >>
> >>   This is the relevant thread on tor-project:
> >> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-June/000459.html
> >>
> >>   As you can see, the emphasis is on off-topic posts and not the
> >> members' personal beliefs.  Though having my inbox overrun with
> >> more than 300 messages filled with the most ludicrous rape
> >> apologetics was certainly a factor in my decision to ask for the
> >> ability to remove subscribers.
> >>
> >> juan wrote:
> >>
> >>> >       I'm obviously re-subscribing right now. The fuck is wrong
> >>>> > with you.
> >>>>
> >>>> You're banned. Go elsewhere.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>         so you work for the department of defense, eh shitbag? Too
> >>>         stupid and coward to even admit it =)
> >>>
> >>
> >>   Senpai isn't going to notice you bro.
> >>
> >