tools for enrollment
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Wed Jun 22 05:39:34 PDT 2016
Trigger warning and Punk anarchist apostasy alert: the following question
may be considered entirely blasphemous to punk tradition!
Prior attempts to put the following concept have been downright clumsy,
thus the following:
1) A significant portion of the adult humans in America might be
considered part of the so-called "bible belt".
2) One foundation of any sane community is the right of a human to
grow his own food and any other plant, for medicinal or other
purposes (personal enjoyment, to trade with others, etc)
3) A document called the King James Bible (one random example), speaks
to this fundamental human right, in a way which certain adult humans
can receive as, well let's just call it "the gospel truth."
The question:
Ought we reject outright all passages in such a document on any grounds
of personal preferred vehemence such as including but not limited to
the grounds of superstition, historical abuse, unnecessary
externalization of authority, or any and other such grounds,
or ought we, for the purposes of communicating with certain of our
fellow adult humans regarding such a fundamental human right (which
right must be upheld for any community or society to call itself just,
righteous, sane and etc) ought we highlight those particular passages
in said document, in support of said fundamental human right?
(If the latter, humorous slogans give rise to themselves such as for
example "Be truly punk, get down and rock it with the King James Bible!")
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list