A disputation of Spooner?

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Sun Jun 12 06:04:28 PDT 2016


Been referred a couple of times now, and finally spent the necessary time
to properly absorb Spooner's The Science of Justice.

I am indebted to those who have encouraged me to do so. Thanks in
particular to the quiet and gentle persistence of Juan.


So. Very. Compelling.


Who, if anyone, disputes, could dispute, might dispute, or suggests any
possible dispute whatsoever, of any of the foundations Lysander states in
such simple terms, and if so, which ones (quote of relevant verbiage
appreciated)?

:
http://www.panarchy.org/spooner/law.1882.html

Black and white absolutes allowed, nuanced views encouraged, statists,
fascists, nihilists, anarchists and all others encouraged, presumptions
tolerated, projections gladly received, ad homs and straw men shall be
summarily mocked and enjoyed by all.



  <drum roll>

  <royal trumpets introducing the knights of the argumentus>


<pallid and slightly high pitched eunuchian voice>
   Hear ye!

   Hear ye!

   By royal order of the ghostly spirit of Lord Spooner,

   Let the disputations begin.



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list