[offlist trollbait] Re: cryptographically-provable anonymity

[juan]

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:56:42 -0700
Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 06/08/2016 10:06 AM, juan wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:31:58 -0700
> > Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> >
> >> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> >> Subject: 	Re: cryptographically-provable anonymity
> >> Date: 	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:49:04 -0300
> >> From: 	juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
> >> To: 	rayzer at riseup.net
> >>
> >>
> >>> 	come on rayzer, be 'transparent' like your buddies from
> >>> the pentagon and publish your gov't sourced income
> >>
> >> Juan... I gave you MORE than enough metainfo about me to figure out
> >> who or what I am.
> > 	Who you pretend to be, or even actual details about your
> > 	personal life are wholly irrelevant. What matters here is,
> > for instance, your laughable defense of the pentagon's 'anonimity'
> > 	network.
> >  
> 
> I'm not defending "the pentagon's 'anonimity' network." I'm saying, in
> so many words, that even the most compromised network still has uses


	You keep defending tor and making completely retarded excuses
	for it while denying that you are defending it.

	I quoted an 'expert witness' who also happens to be tor's capo
	mafioso clearly saying that tor is fucked and yet you keep
	vomiting nonsense. 

	Seriously, what the fuck is wrng with you. What's your evidence
	and expertise that allows you to 'refute' syverson and co.?
	


> And in the case of
> something like tor if everyone used it that would increase the
> efforts needed to stalk the network. Even if every node win any
> number of measures than sifting through x to the 6th power packets.

	DUDE! What the fuck are you talkng about. You are a charlatan. 

> 
> My take is dissuading people from using it because it's compromised
> destroys what little effectiveness it might have,


	Are you crazy, utterly stupid, or what. Wait no, you are a
	government agent promoting a system that is clearly flawed, to
	the point that the same scumbags who created admit it.

	And yet you, 


> and as the gubmint
> would like, renders it useless.
> 
> By that logic, you're the fed Juan.

	Yes, by the logic of a fucktard like you, who promotes a
	honeypot, I am the fed. 

	And by 'ordinary' and sound logic, you, a promoter of a
	honeypot, are the fed. 
	


> 
> Rr
> 
> >
> >> You've got my approximate age (teen in the 60s)
> >>
> >> The city I was in in the late 60s
> >>
> >> The damning fact that the NYPD stalked me and went after my dad's
> >> security clearance!
> >>
> >> That alone ought to be enough to get my jacket out of cold storage.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/07/2016 11:46 AM, juan wrote:
> >>> 	Sure. Because a marxist clown like you says so. 
> >> You pegged me Juan... I'm a Groucho Marxist, and a John Lennonist
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>