The cheap low risk node majority attack, pki, geoip, etc

[juan]

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:00:29 -0400
Steve Kinney <admin at pilobilus.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/07/2016 03:13 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:59:26 -0400 Steve Kinney
> > <admin at pilobilus.net> wrote:
> 
> >> TOR is a two edged sword that can also be used against the
> >> National Interest, so the NSA thinks TOR stinks.
> > 
> > False, please do not post garbage. By now any 'observer' should 
> > realize that the nsa is a 'fully capable' 'global passive 
> > adversary'  - In no way tor can be used against the **US** national
> > interest.
> > 
> > HELL, even tor scumbags admit it
> > 
> > http://www.nrl.navy.mil/itd/chacs/biblio/users-get-routed-traffic-corr
> elation-tor-realistic-adversaries
> >
> >  Do your fucking homework Steve.
> 
> Garbage, please do not post "False." 


	Take it up with fucking syverson steve. It's quite interesting
	that the highest capo mafioso from tor admits it doesn't work
	and yet you deny it. 


> TOR can be used effectively as a
> component in tactical security protocols, because TOR can prevent
> identification of users who do brief hit-and-run network access via
> physical routers not associated with the users in question.

	like any cheap VPN or proxy cnt. 



> 
> And of course, TOR can be up to 100% effective against adversaries who
> are /not/ top tier signals intelligence services.

	Which is not the point, motherfucker.




> 
> :o)
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXVyfdAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqpCcH/RMepc8NDnZvDSnd2Q05eK67
> orX2TIlhE3Ee4XHR03Dqm7jmltWok7JkHkBT6BHTuFLuW2p3AGyxp7aDqCZYjeTA
> YtowxSR8uOirsAqvAt3FmHln9kvdhsagu3Chsubp3jaMx+vymoPtGOUqBwvgdVMP
> WNcGREwX6Za8/PJ4gfp/fWXpgaOwsFoRGaU6qvYmemtzug2kxuPrbn+7XcPKgJAg
> rwIkjbnd0kjYp8UUazLnSu7cIlM+HL89qEE/0fi+SWz6vQ8YyQXW3sDffZ15Nt5p
> u79cHC/cRdQpMWdvTjvVs7ALPtvCSpBMdOcy3vbNiclKa9RSUVcfEI6tyrGZitY=
> =3uG5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----