[private] Re: [tor-talk] http://jacobappelbaum.net/

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 11:47:59 PDT 2016


On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:23:17 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:


> 
> Apparently there are a number of easy-to-describe improvements which
> could be made to the TOR protocol, such as increasing the number of
> hops, generating fake extra traffic, etc, which would improve it
> greatly.  TOR is a net positive,

	Or let's try this : 

	Tor is a crass example of controlled opposition. No doubt
	controlled opposition is a net positive...for the
	establishment. And so it must be a net negative for the
	opposition.



> but that should not be at the
> expense of continuing improvements.             Jim Bell  





More information about the cypherpunks mailing list