[tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

[StealthMonger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> writes:

> Fill / chaff seem needed, otherwise in an all wheat network,
> input traffic on one side seems to match output traffic on the
> other side at some point, regardless of storage / delay.
> Fixed packet sizes seem to help.
> Fill ratios up to 100% utilization can mask the wheat.
> Minimum fill is amount needed for plausible deniability
> that single input can't be mapped to a single output.
> ie: 10MiB in, must have at least two outputs that
> received 10MiB.

This stuff has been in daily use since the last millennium.  The links
below are out of date but should get you started.

> Is there any group / list that is actively researching
> or developing such networks? Or that wants to?

See usenet newsgroup alt.privacy,anon-server

- -- 


 -- StealthMonger <StealthMonger at nym.mixmin.net>
    Long, random latency is part of the price of Internet anonymity.

   anonget: Is this anonymous browsing, or what?
   http://groups.google.ws/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/073f34abb668df33?dmode=source&output=gplain

   stealthmail: Hide whether you're doing email, or when, or with whom.
   mailto:stealthsuite at nym.mixmin.net?subject=send%20index.html


Key: mailto:stealthsuite at nym.mixmin.net?subject=send%20stealthmonger-key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAldQ2XwACgkQDkU5rhlDCl7KWwCeImYXWb+tWLOd4GT6g/8PLDFM
/1wAoK0Wl1r418g7JN8nmegEj058hHH1
=1Sdo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----