the most annoying thing about Juan

[John]

On July 21, 2016 2:26:18 AM EDT, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 01:52:11 -0600
>Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> On 07/19/2016 03:38 PM, juan wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 03:40:20 -0600
>> > Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>> > 
>> >> On 07/19/2016 03:15 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> >>> The dawning inescapable realisation that "he's right" and was
>> >>> right all along about Tor Inc.
>> >>
>> >> Well, I wouldn't go that far ;)
>> >>
>> >> If Tor were actually secure, I could accept that US government
>> >> uses it for evil.
>> > 
>> > 	So Mirimir, what's the problem here? Am I failing to explain
>> > 	fuckingly basic facts or are you playing dumb? 
>> > 
>> > 	Tor IS actually secure IF YOU ARE THE FUCKING US MILITARY.
>> > If on the other hand you are one of their TARGETS then tor IS NOT
>> > 	SECURE.
>> > 
>> > 	Is something unclear? 
>> 
>> What's your evidence for that? I doubt that it's technical, from what
>> you've shared. 
>
>	It certainly is 'technical', pretty basic, and you must be
>	as aware of this just as I am, so I don't understand why you
>	want me to repeat it. Trolling? Bah.
>
>	But here it goes again! Pay fucking attention.
>
>	The US military is a 'global adversary' - they have enough taps
>	on cables, exchanges, ASs, whatever, to be able to deanonimize
>	tor users. Especially so called 'hidden' services. 
>
>	
>	On the other hand, people like, say, Ross Ulbricht, don't have
>	taps on the global fiber infrastructure, don't have access to
>	IXPs, can't hack routers, etc. Get that?

I agree, sadly. I still think it's interesting tech though.

John

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.