schneier's concentration camp

Rayzer rayzer at
Sat Jul 16 08:09:17 PDT 2016

On 07/15/2016 10:19 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Fact: Schnier deleted Juan's post.

Fact. Juan is a TROLL who couldn't possibly have anything rational to
add to anything Schnier posts.

First ad hom and he's gone most anywhere anytime anyway.

Tough darts. No one's got the time for spew.

I have ongoing problems with the local indymedia redacting my comments
because they don't adhere to their unfathomable ideology that I can't
quite identify, so I simply don't bother posting there.

What was it someone said about freedom of the press is OWNING the press?

If Juan has something to say that Bruce Schnier doesn't want to hear or
allow in his comments he should start a blog. Write an open letter and
use all those SEO tricks to get his post noticed by the same people who
read Schnier.

The fallacious assumption you're making here is that Schnier owes him a
soapbox to respond, IF what Juan does can be considered 'responding'. No
one owes anyone shit.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list