The Moon landing again - Fw: Neil Armstrong's Boots

[Rayzer]

On 07/12/2016 07:07 AM, Tom wrote:
>>> No atmosphere, no blowing.
>> He's talking about the module thrusters, you don't need
>> atmosphere to blow particles on the ground.
> Ok. It's been debunked anyway:
> http://space.stackexchange.com/questions/1691/why-didnt-the-apollo-11-lander-blow-the-dust-away-or-why-does-it-look-like-it
>
>
> - Tom
>


Well I stand corrected. It was the "Electrical opposite" of what I
stated in my last post.

Positive Ionic charge, not negative.


Rr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160712/c98b6658/attachment-0003.sig>