The Moon landing again - Fw: Neil Armstrong's Watch [Was: Boots]
Nadine Earnshaw
nadine at iinet.net.au
Mon Jul 11 22:34:51 PDT 2016
with the number of staff that work at nasa how exactly would it be
that they were all in on the conspiracy?way too many people to have
such a thing pulled off in secrecy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zenaan Harkness"
To:
Cc:
Sent:Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:09:42 +1000
Subject:Re: The Moon landing again - Fw: Neil Armstrong's Watch [Was:
Boots]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:01:53PM -0700, Rayzer wrote:
> On 07/11/2016 04:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > This massive thrust would have blown the dust away from the
landing area
> > creating a massive dust cloud, so why was thick dust still on the
ground
> > and no massive dust cloud? Please explain NASA.
>
>
> Coulda woulda shouda... All I know is my dad, as mentioned
previously,
> worked for NASA as a tech writer coordinator and also worked the
Gemini
> and Apollo series. As a keepsake, he gave me one of those "Omega
Moon
> Watches" that were mementos for mission workers. It wasn't a retail
> distribution which were all self-winders. It was an old fashioned
wind-up.
>
> Why? They didn't know if a self-winder would work in Zero
gravity...
>
> WHO ON FUCKING EARTH would bother to create a hoax so complex you'd
have
> to do that to cover your ass?
Certainly not a retailer acting in naieve self interest, and who has
no
inside access to the set being used to fake the landings and moon
rover
films.
> Rr
> Ps. the watch didn't keep time worth a shit and I sold it to a
collector
> for a couple of hundred dollars.
PS No one said Omega watch company was in on the conspiracy! Who on
firetrucking earth would bother to consider they were?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2352 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160712/60a928af/attachment-0002.txt>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list