FBI Fails To Charge Sec. Clinton

Rayzer rayzer at riseup.net
Tue Jul 5 16:03:29 PDT 2016

On 07/05/2016 11:47 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/politics
> https://twitter.com/wikileaks
> https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/07/05/1556204/the-fbi-recommends-not-to-indict-hillary-clinton-for-email-misconduct
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-server.html
> The Internet seems to be all over this today.

Diversion op. If the candidates did what they were supposed to be doing.
Discussing the details of their presidential policies, it would be easy
to see they all intend (within the bounds of what's realistically
possible) to do the same exact fucking thing.

Welcome to the one party state with two right wing factions. Donald
Trump, a lifelong neoliberal democrat, is running on the Rethuglican
ticket and Hillary Clinton, a neocon Republican (except for womens
rights issues), is running for the Demoncrats

I figure with Donald Trump, having pretty much destroyed the
Republican's chance for a president in the oval orifice, and Burn-E
siphoning off 3rd party support, Hillary will be the first president in
decades to have a REAL mandate instead of the bogus ones, like Reagan
claimed with 21% of the vote.

She will still do exactly what the elite tell her to do. If by some
fluke Trump won. So would he.

They don't want to be the stars in the next 'zapruder' footage.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160705/3069e87a/attachment-0003.sig>

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list