Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 08:59:37 PDT 2016


On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:56:56 -0400
John <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On July 21, 2016 5:21:04 AM EDT, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:51:49 +0000
> >Sean Lynch <seanl at literati.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:59 PM juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:44:16 +0300
> >> > Georgi Guninski <guninski at guninski.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives
> >> > > and move to something allegedly better?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >         We need to get rid of tor first. Resources wasted on tor
> >are
> >> >         resources that can't be used in good projects.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> They are not your resources to redirect, 
> >	
> >	No they are not mine. They belong to the people who the US
> >	gov't/military robs. No taxes no tor.
> 
> Well, phrasing I guess, but most of the relays just belong to
> volunteers. 

	Apologies John, I really don't mean to pick on you
	personally. 

	I'd point out though that the organization exists thanks to
	state funding. The whole thing would be rather different if all
	the participants were volunteers.

	(are all high speed nodes also run by and paid for volunteers?)



> I run a relay most of the time, although I dont consider
> it one of the top 5 or even top 10 services I maintain on that
> particular box... It's kind of just a half ass interesting service to
> fuck with occasionally.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list