KRS-1 says 'Lets Box' about Institutional Slander [was: Re: the most annoying thing about Juan]

[Rayzer]

Rapper KRS-One checks in regarding the institutional slander of Hip-Hop
master Afrika Bambaataa and backs my play.

http://atlantablackstar.com/2016/07/20/krs-one-defends-afrika-bambaataa-tells-those-with-a-problem-to-quit-hip-hop/

Wanna box MFs? Some of you you seem to live in a sheltered cubie
world... just waiting for someone you talked smack about to simply show
up with a tec9 and finish the discussion. Stress much?

The REAL world out there is VERY DIFFERENT, yet after decades of
backstabbing and office shooter incidents, some of you remain simply
stoopid.

As I told a group of people at a public event just the other day in
response to a question posed by a local pastor about people talking
behind one's back:

> "You can talk about me behind my back, or in front of me, but you'd
better be speaking the truth or else there's going to be trouble."

Someone talking smack without the facts is a snitch waiting to get
stitched, and NO ONE will feel sorry for them.

Until someone files charges, no matter WHAT the claims are, I back Jacob
Appelbaum 100% and I do not even know him. It's called "Solidarity".
Something lacking among FEUDAL LIBERTARIANS who infest the coding world,
and over the years turned it into a damn near useless pursuit... working
for the moneymen who pretty much stopped any real development in the
world of personal computing dead in it's fucking tracks.

Rr


On 07/20/2016 06:47 PM, Rayzer wrote:
>
> On 07/20/2016 12:16 PM, Sean Lynch wrote:
>
>
>     So you're saying you'd do business with someone that several
>     people said robbed them?
>
>
> Depends on who those people are, and if they're not willing to
> confront the person BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY (in this case meaning get
> the cops), I ABSOLUTELY assume bullshit.
>
> You can say whatever you like, but if you can take action, especially
> action that isn't going to get you 30-90 days or longer for dotting
> someone's i, and you don't...
>
> You're a punk.
>
> Rr
>
>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:27 AM Александр <afalex169 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:afalex169 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     2016-07-20 20:32 GMT+03:00 Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net
>>     <mailto:rayzer at riseup.net>>:
>>
>>         Sorry Passion is no excuse for rumor-mongering.
>>
>>         I just happen to know WAY TOO MANY PEOPLE who have been
>>         falsely accused like this.
>>
>>     +1!
>>
>>
>>         Innocent until proven guilty. That's the way it's supposed to
>>         work in 'Merica.
>>
>>     that's the way it MUST work in any normal society/person's head.
>>     Otherwise it's medieval inquisition. Period.
>>
>>
>> So you're saying you'd do business with someone that several people
>> said robbed them? Let an accused child molester be alone with your
>> kids because they were never convicted?
>>
>> There are different standards of proof for different functions.
>> "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is not necessary for "we don't want this
>> person associated with our project/company/etc". No standard
>> whatsoever is required for an individual deciding with whom to do
>> business, who to trust to watch their kids or housesit, etc.
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 6790 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160721/54bbe592/attachment-0002.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160721/54bbe592/attachment-0002.sig>